Hacker News Reader

You have it backwards. They're assuming non-open source is backdoor'ed. Not that open source isn't backdoor'ed.

I don't have it backwards. That is what I said. They are assuming non open source is backdoored. That does not mean open source is not also backdoored.

No, you you said

>Why are you assuming that only non open source devices are vulnerable?

Yes, the word "only" is causing the confusion.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com