Trilobites killed by volcanic ash
bristol.ac.uk
bristol.ac.uk
The trilobite.info site has lots of drawings of all the different trilobites that have been described: https://www.trilobites.info/
What do you like about the design?
It just presents a lot of information and makes that information appropriately navigable. The lack of trendy design language makes me believe that the operator knows and cares about the subject matter itself, which I find reassuring and refreshing in a world that's become saturated in blogspam, SEO, subscription sales, and ad engagement.
Many of the pages have:
<meta name="GENERATOR" content="Mozilla/4.7 [en]C-CCK-MCD NSCPCD47 (Win95; I) [Netscape]">
which would place them around 1999.Damn this website is amazing!
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature09166
(remember reading that one back then...)
I did horribly in this lab session in college but it was still fun.
For each fossil, there's probably a thousand individuals that never got rocked.
Going from a 2D image to 3D must be really quite something!
But the new info about the mouth parts is extraordinary and could still lead to big discoveries and earthquakes in taxonomy. The problem with this animals is that all the mouth pieces that fossilized were from different types or in different positions compared with all arthropods alive or extinct that were not trilobites.
First sentence of TFA.
This is not a claim that all trilobites were made extinct by volcanic ash, but that these fossils were the result of an ashfall, by which previously unavailable anatomical detail was preserved. The headline is misleading, but even the shallowest read of the article would have mooted your speculation.