Framework Laptop 16, six months later
theverge.com
theverge.com
Still looking forward to buying a Framework to put next to my System76
My only complaints are ones that don't matter too much for me: battery life isn't great (5-6 hours) but I rarely need it to be, and it does get hot when playing games (but I usually do that on my PC).
[0] the USB multimonitor used to suck but I think a popOS revision fixed that, and the internal microphone makes unusably bad audio.
I own a 12th gen framework and even though Linux works well on it, it won't save you from the occasional tinkering : How do I configure firefox to have it work well with the GPU ? Should I change the power-management software for something better ? Etc. Linux support is ok but it's not first class as I thought it would be. System76 clients seems to have better tuned software but the hardware seems less good. I wouldn't know.
If there was a premium option for Framework with PopOS + System76 support I would have paid for it, and I suspect I wouldn't be the only one.
That sounds not awesome…
The CPU temp can get high, but that is expected for these chips. They will run up to max temps and throttle to maintain peak performance under the current conditions.
My work laptop sounds like a vacuum just from opening Teams/Edge at the same time, without even doing any active work.
Sounds suspiciously like "I didn't assemble my laptop correctly, something is slightly loose somewhere".
As a whole, how many people buy a Framework laptop and put Windows on it, of all things? I can't imagine that's more than 10%.
So some laptops defintely get random bluescreens more than others, I wouldn't blame the user as a first option, although it is possible the user is at fault
It solves the bad keyboard issue, and beyond that the HHKB is genuinely an excellent keyboard. As an added bonus is that you can use the HHKB as your desktop keyboard when the laptop is in clamshell mode. If you really want the Thinkpad nipple, there's always the HHKB Studio, too.
- windows did not boot correctly
- windows did not suspend correctly
- varibright software setting
- cooling is not strong enough
- seams with cover plates
Seems much more mixed than "many".
Yes Windows was used but it’s Framework’s job to make sure the drivers, software, and hardware all work together well on Windows as Windows is going to be a huge percentage of their customers.
There is actual honest-to-goodness linux support and active commitment from the manufacturer to continue supporting it. It's the first time in a long time that I've felt my interests were aligned with those of the laptop manufacturer,.
The Intel processor gets a bit too hot for many people's liking if you're doing something that pegs the CPU, but it hasn't bothered me. I'm definitely buying a Framework again (or, more likely, just upgrading the motherboard with the latest AMD).
Did you mean 13 or 16?
The uncertainty of knowing specific about the equipment (and I don't mean in this specific case but that, in general, we all don't know a lot of obvious things about our own devices) is what makes review threads so hard. Particularly when it comes to trying to weigh claims of have have/haven't had ${ISSUE} about things. I wish there was some better balanced way to do reviews than single news style reports, ad hoc discussion, or aggregation of bot reviews. Meta news style reviews maybe?
Linux works ok but it's not first class either, it's not tinkering free. That's really my main criticism towards Framework, else it's a great machine.
The biggest thing that you'll miss is battery life. I've been running Linux laptops for years so I've kind of gotten used to a 5–6-hour battery life, but I know that that would drive some people crazy.
The other thing from the review that does still apply to my laptop is that it does get hotter than a MacBook would. I don't find that it gets uncomfortably hot unless I'm playing a game, but it definitely does in those cases.
I've experienced none of the other issues described in the review: the build quality is fantastic and my Linux system (Debian) has been very stable.
I understand that extra performance is nice in this price class, but I also use the laptop in my lap and I'd like to avoid toasty testies. I still think that a lower power consumption CPU would be the way to go (would have been the bottleneck for the GPU in games?). The current 7840HS model is 14% more performant than the U model (in multithreaded, and around 5% for single threat) at an additional 24W of dissipated power.
https://www.cpubenchmark.net/compare/5322vs5258/AMD-Ryzen-7-...