That job you applied for might not exist
cbsnews.com
cbsnews.com
Mass-producing adverts for non-existent positions is a method of defrauding investors that is not currently policed in any way. Will this loophole be addressed by the SEC or HCoFS in the future? It depends on the next election, but possibly not at all.
How so?
In other words, why would investors who want to use hiring as an indicator of performance deliberately look at job postings, which they know might be BS, instead of payroll budgets on the financial reports, which aren't?
This is short sighted as this will ultimately push more job seekers into going through external recruiters and these companies will be left paying recruitment premiums.
A candidate applying for a job - even with a single click - involuntarily and automatically has a small hope that they might get that job. If that candidate is in a more desperate situation, not receiving a reply, being denied or mislead, has a mental toll.
Do this for a couple of job ads and the effect compounds.
Stats: https://x.com/gaybearres/status/1807738852259299626?s=48
- 40% of companies admit to posting fake jobs
- 70% of managers believe posting fake job listings boosted revenue
- 65% of managers believe the job ads had a positive impact on morale
- 77% of managers reported an uptick in productivity among workers
- On comment: 70% of managers believe fake job postings are morally justified
The last might be the most important and overlooked: https://medium.com/@trendguardian/why-we-are-dispensable-7a5...
How are job listings and company revenue related?