To date, Bill Gates has donated more money to charity than Steve Jobs was ever worth. Steve Jobs...has donated less money to charity than your average churchgoer.
To date, Bill Gates has donated more money to charity than Steve Jobs was ever worth. Steve Jobs...has donated less money to charity than your average churchgoer.
http://www.getrichslowly.org/blog/2006/07/29/the-wealthy-100...
A. T. Stewart, anybody? Frederick Weyerhaeuser? William Weightman? John I. Blair?
Mind you, you don't have to be a big-name philanthropist to be on that list and remembered. Rockefeller was so goddamn rich that he's famous just for being incredibly rich. Howard Hughes is remembered for his eccentricities. Samuel Colt is remembered because he invented something. And then there's George Washington...
Okay but seriously, you don't have a clue what Jobs did with his money and neither do I. So there's no point speculating.
Steve Jobs may have been a genius salesman, but he was definitely not a philanthropist.
Giving publicly is important if you want to be remembered for your charitable work.
Whether Jobs donated anonymously or didn't donate at all, I can respect him so much more for not chasing attention and approval.
Regardless, Gladwell is taking the lazy columnist's approach of irresponsible prediction, intending to provoke indignation. There's plenty of room in history books, and both Gates and Jobs will have significant entries. I'll submit Edison and Telsa as examples of contemporaries in the same general field who both remain widely known decades after they passed on.
So there's one anecdotal data point for you.