This is peak HN: getting accused of being "disingenuous" for making a glib comment complaining about too many "fixed typo" and other trivial commits in a git log.

>On approval it could look at the linked issue and include the title and appropriate pattern for that issue as the message for any merge/squash commits it creates.

Squashing is great IMO, but the problem is that many organizations prohibit it, because it erases a developer's commit history, because apparently it's really, really interesting to pore through dozens of commits where a developer fixed some whitespace, fixed some typos, etc. (Before you say something about rebasing, these same organizations also frequently prohibit that too.)