Not sure I agree with their stance, but good on them for having the courage to revisit some our default assumptions. Some decisions will work out and others they’ll have to finetune.
Not sure I agree with their stance, but good on them for having the courage to revisit some our default assumptions. Some decisions will work out and others they’ll have to finetune.
IMHO the point of having a firewall which simply denies all incoming connections is, that once a user starts installing a few programs, sooner or later some of them might open ports, even w/o malicious intent.
If they want to provide an easy to use and secure system, IMHO there should be a firewall and each port has to be opened explicitly.
In the end, this is really down to opinion and there is no objective true answer, so I'd rather use Fedora-Atomic if I need immutability.
So having a firewall running can provide a bit of extra protection in case you don't always check to see what ports you have open/listening.