Online v. print reading: which one makes us smarter?
sciam.com
sciam.com
They acknowledge later in the article that the findings about PC manipulation might be different for people who were raised in a different time, and I definitely agree -- a blank browser tab with focus on the URL bar is about as calming as possible for me. I definitely get annoyed when I'm reading a paper news article and I want to research a reference, doubly so when online at a paper news site when they don't link to things they obviously would if they were true online sources.
While I agree that the second half holds merit, I think it's wrong to hang that on the internet itself. I definitely "watch" reddit sometimes, just clicking pics links and skimming programming articles without really soaking anything in.
I think that being online doesn't change the need for discretion when choosing your information sources when you're attempting to do more than be passively entertained.
Instead of paying $30 for printed book, I'd pay $5 for online book with no ads.
Paper books are so one-way communication. Online books are interactive with 2-way communication abilities.
Picture is worth of 1000 words. So paper books now add images. Now video is worth of 100,000 words. What's wrong in adding Videos in the book?
And most importantly, I cannot search something in paper books. That's the single most reason all paper books should be converted into online books. That advantage surpasses all these negligent disadvantages by huge margin.
My $0.02s of course!