Hacker News Reader

To me, glasses seem like a very interesting form factor, perhaps with a smart watch or wristband for better hand gesture recognition.

You can wear them all the time, even if your hands are busy, it won't look weird, they're the perfect place for a microphone and a camera, and the frames are just in the right spot for delivering sound to your ears via bone conduction.

Input is probably going to be the biggest hurdle, just like it was with touch screens, especially in situations where using your voice isn't acceptable.

I think Google had the right idea with Google Glass, but they were far too early, just like IBM had exactly the right idea with Simon[1].

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_Simon

Apple Vision Pro is unbelievably good at figuring out what you’re looking at, seamlessly adjusting for eye saccades and a host of other weird things our bodies do. I imagine the tech will eventually get shrunk down.

I think the question is: what’s hardest of the following:

* Knowing what you’re looking or pointing at

* Getting you private audio

* Getting you public video

* Getting you private video

And we’ll get hardware constraints based on that list. It seems to me like private video is hardest in hardware without glasses, but public video might be harder in terms of capex - e.g. we need different materials in our spaces, or a lot of projectors, or … Anyway fun to speculate about all this.

Private-ish audio is solved with bone conduction, see the new Meta Rayban Glasses or the Bose Frames for example.

There's more leakage than you get with normal headphones, it's not something you could use in a church, library or cinema without annoying people, but it's private enough for most use cases.

Re Humane Ai Pin - did you never receive it because you cancelled your order? Or did you never onboard? There's a bit of an unusual process with ordering the Ai Pin where it won't ship until you "onboard" i.e. set up your account/service with Humane

I never onboarded. I should hunt through my emails though is what this makes me think of.

What’s the goal of this? Front loading a frustrating web based setup, so the out of box experience can be smooth and seem magical? Is that the goal? Kind of like how Amazon can pre-register a Kindle with a user’s account if they select it while ordering.

You’d think this would be part of the order process instead of a completely separate and detached step.

Aside from something bad like this security hole, I can't understand the hate, it's pretty obvious the R1 was a fun novelty, a gimmick.

Anyone with a basic understanding of tech, would understand you're not going to get Apple level breakthrough engineering from a start-up and at that price point.

I feel this got swept up in the wave of hatred for the Humane AI Pin (again very obvious what it'd be). Humane's biggest fault was that they marketed it as being at Apple level quality, an impossible goal they set for themselves.

Reminds me of Magic Leap.

I speculate the hate comes from the people invested in smart phones as they are today. Magic leap didn't get mainstream hate like the rabbit did afaict

Because the magic leap was an innovative new product for early adopters.

The Rabbit promised to be a smartphone-killer, when all it was was a shitty android phone that only runs one app.

I think people are mad about being scammed, not out of having an unsuccessful product.

Sure it did. They promised something completely made up and at launch it looked to be about 1/10th of what they were saying it would be like. The Rabbit did the same by promising one thing and shipping another.

I think Humane seemed the more honest out of all of them with what actually shipped, but should have probably sold it at $200 instead of the price of a higher-end phone.

https://www.theverge.com/2018/8/8/17662040/magic-leap-one-cr...

You're thinking people don't want a startrek communicator (if it worked)? Do you have any evidence of that?

I just think they were too harsh in their judgement toward experimental and boundary pushing tech, treating it like it should be as polished as smartphones. Same people would applaud iPhone{n} for some incremental step forward even at a high price point

> I can't understand the hate

I think it's because of the promises of the team (new Large Action Model) vs what's actually being delivered (the model is some scripts). The team has a history of over promising and underdelivering (or scamming - depending on your perspective). It's also economically unviable. Somehow you're meant to get free LLM calls for life but there's no way for them to actually cover those. There's not really any communication about how it might be a limited time thing for early adopters or how it could ever get to be sustainable.

If they had focused on what they have, they probably could have charged the same amount and people would generally be OK with it. But they've over promised and under delivered again. I think the reaction is pretty understandable.

> The team has a history of over promising and underdelivering (or scamming - depending on your perspective).

Their attitude of not communicating anything and basically inventing stuff the R1 can do without actually having the engineering to back it up is what is "scamming" to me. Over-promising and under-delivering is one thing, but lying about what something can do and then going back to the engineering team to "just make it happen" is what I am reading between the lines here.

I think the hate directed their way has more to do with the outsized claims of the founder, Jesse Lyu. For example, he claimed that you're buying a device with a "LAM" but it turned out to be playwright scripts wrapping APIs + OpenAI APIs, and the underlying action model was missing (or very nascent at ship). The team also took a lot of shortcuts security-wise and is getting wrecked for it now (it's not just one hole):

https://x.com/xyz3va/status/1805689140639408277

https://x.com/xyz3va/status/1805985433156759781 (this is the OP)

https://x.com/xyz3va/status/1805993239368860069

Doesn't help that he was shilling crypto right before rabbit. What people love about the form factor has mostly to do with Teenage Engineering's quirky design. Somehow Jesse is a board member there, it seems.

In general I don't recommend trusting their software. If you like the hardware, you can flash AOSP and use google assistant -- it's way more capable and AOSP isn't harvesting your credentials. https://github.com/RabbitHoleEscapeR1/r1_escape

This is the reason; the product is imbued with the negative externalities of the people and ideas associated with it.

Well and the realities of bad security, bad usability with touchscreen typically disabled, crappy battery life ^^'

Coffeezilla did a nice piece on this, piecing together some of the crypto threads. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zLvFc_24vSM

>Somehow Jesse is a board member there, it seems.

With my eternal love/hate relationship with Teenage Engineering (cheap enough music gadgets vs overpriced metal folding table and OP1 price inflation) I'm almost excited to find more reasons to stop giving the company any more brain time / money ever again.

> it's pretty obvious

...to you. Someone who lurks hacker news.

Given what my some of the people I work with think AI is, I can't even imagine how bad it is out there.

>it's pretty obvious the R1 was a fun novelty, a gimmick.

And the founders asking for billion dollar buyout? Just a little joke.

And the $200 you spent on a device that doesn't do what it was advertised as? Just a prank, bro.

The $1B buyout was Humane

> I can't understand the hate, it's pretty obvious the R1 was a fun novelty, a gimmick.

I get pretty annoyed when people lie to me to sell me something even if it's obvious they're lying.

Even moreso if I want to try the thing they've actually built and want people experimenting with this stuff. If I didn't care I could just ignore it.

But if I do care and also I know their main claims are deceitful it means I have to waste energy wondering if the claims that aren't obvious nonsense are also deceitful.

On top of this they managed to make major news rounds with their bogus presentation. This means my family who don't usually consume tech news, and for whom none of it was obvious nonsense, got super hyped about it and I had to tell them no, this is just tech people lying to you.

We SHOULD encourage hacking on form factor, novelty gimmick devices or not. Lying and misrepresenting when doing so is the opposite of that, it makes it harder for the next folks to want to give it a go.

>I get pretty annoyed when people lie to me to sell me something even if it's obvious they're lying.

Exactly. When companies put out half-baked products to try to ride a hype wave, they're betting on idea that their customers are idiots with the same low standards. Companies need to hold themselves accountable and have enough respect for themselves and for customers to not inflict crap onto the world.

> I think it's clear that a phone isn't the final state for these interactions

That isn't clear to me at all, although continuing to experiment is worthwhile.

"Battery powered computer which fits in a pocket, having a screen/speakers/radio/microphone/camera/vibrator" is a hard form factor to beat. There's a lot of room to improve the specifics of how they work, but I would bet on something recognizably similar being in widespread use hundreds of years from now, provided that industrial civilization continues.

Voice-driven ambient computing will probably become more prominent than it is now, but that doesn't cover anything visual, so a device which can provide images on command will stay relevant. For something like a map, audio can only provide an inferior experience, and maps are one of the non-negotiable uses of a personal device, and likely to remain so.

I think watch or earbud are still the only acceptable wearable form factor. Add pinhole cameras so it's aware of its surroundings and you could have a very useful assistant that keeps up with what you're doing in realtime.

Banks and others imagine terminals as earrings, with (presumably) beam forming audio in a ‘mid tech’ scenario. How visuals get shown varies, from “holograms created by magic” to “smart walls”. We seem to be pretty close, like a year or two out, from high quality spatially aware “show the human information right here in this room” — I’d bet that a small model could do a great job at picking a place to show info right now, but we don’t really have ‘smart’ environments yet in general.

We are working on something very different. To be honest, i got mad when i saw the rabbit released. It was clear it's just a gadget & a grifter product. And i hate, that we spend much more time on really creating something and now will be much later than the grifters who rushed something.

But then i guess, they are smarter. We are running out of money (bootstrapped) & don't have a working product yet to pitch to investors. But i'd rather fail than releasing a half-assed product to make a quick-buck and lie about it constantly.

I just don't know where to find potential investors to talk to, who are up for a high risk consumer hard- & software, early stage, in europe... If anyone got some tips, they'd be greatly appreciated. Not much time left before we're dead & i think it's better to die close to a prototype than close to a potential funding.

But as i said, i'd love any tips.

Maybe some more (contact) information would be helpful? It is not quite clear what you are doing but it sounds interesting. If you fold, please open source, however I don’t think you have to (there is money in Europe but it depends what you need).

I honestly don't understand pretending that there was any value in this project. The founders have a history of grifting, and the product itself betrays the advertising and the software itself appears held together with shoestrings and bubblegum.

As the founders beg for a buyout even as the product has completely failed, it can't be any more clear that this was a get-rich-quick scheme by the founders, and never a serious venture.

"Experimenting with form factors" is a cop-out for what they actually did.