https://gren-lang.org/book/appendix/faq/#what-are-the-differ...
IMHO it should be more prominent on the hope page or the elevator pitch.
https://gren-lang.org/book/appendix/faq/#what-are-the-differ...
IMHO it should be more prominent on the hope page or the elevator pitch.
Gren isn't compatible, and will never be compatible, with Elm. There is different syntax, API's and runtime characteristics. And it will continue to diverge more and more.
That Gren is a fork, was mostly to save development time. You can expect that much of the compiler and core packages to be rewritten in a few years.
There is also a cottage industry of applications in elm that don’t target the browser like elm-review, and applications running elm code without using its js output, like elm-test-rs. These are made possible by the relative simplicity of elm’s syntax and semantics, which mean getting a workable ast is easy.
(I sure don't miss the constant breakage)
Practically, it’s abandoned.
I use Elm in production and am quite happy with it. Abandoned or not doesn't seem like an issue in practice.