Hacker News Reader

Comment by Retric | Hacker News Reader

No because you can cut funding by slowing the annual increase from the general fund. Be that for inflation or just population growth.

Year 0: general fund hands 100m to schools.

Year 1: General fund hands 101m / year and lotteries add 10m to that yay! 111m for school, or except ‘inflation’ was 2% so it’s more like 109m.

Year 2: General fund hands 102m / year and lottery adds 10.2m, ‘inflation’ was 2%. So adjusting for inflation Schools get ~108 million and general fund only spends ~98m.

Repeat as needed until general fund is handing the equivalent of 90m with the slack taken up by the lottery.

View on HN

Backdoor defunding by not adjusting for inflation is definitely a thing but that seems like a separate issue from what I was responding to re: where the funds come from and if they are kept separate, not how much should be spent in total.

> Repeat as needed until general fund is handing the equivalent of 90m with the slack taken up by the lottery.

The lottery picking up the slack so that the general fund doesn’t have to do all of it is the whole point.

> The lottery picking up the slack so the general fund doesn’t have to do all of it is the whole point.

That’s identical to the lottery just putting money directly into the general fund. Unless the funding source results in an increase in total funding this stuff is pure theatre.

If a person arguing on hackernews can't understand the scam that requires a 3rd grade mathematics education, bthen I don't have a lot for the general public.

And that is why it keeps happening.

Bonus: cut education enough, and it even gets easier to do!

>> The lottery picking up the slack so the general fund doesn’t have to do all of it is the whole point.

> That’s identical to the lottery just putting money directly into the general fund.

While that's true, your example upthread seems to obscure the fact rather than illustrate it. Try this one:

1. (19X3) Oregon funds its public school system to the tune of $70 million. This is "not enough".

2. (19X4) Oregon implements a lottery dedicated to funding the school system. In the meantime, it funds the schools to the tune of $70 million.

3. (19X5) The lottery system has been set up; it provides $20 million just for the schools. Oregon makes up the rest by contributing $50 million out of the general fund.

Where did the money from the lottery go? Not to the schools. The cash flow table clearly shows that funding to the schools hasn't increased while the general fund is up $20 million. Inflation isn't relevant. Allocations from the general fund are discretionary.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com