Is Codeberg.org financially sustainable relying on member fees? Any precedents?
join.codeberg.org
join.codeberg.org
However, I am concerned about the long-term sustainability of Codeberg, especially if it plans to support CI (which is resource-intensive) and attract a significantly larger user base.
Similarweb statistics indicate a substantial difference in traffic between Codeberg and GitHub. While Codeberg has approximately 2 million page views (700.8K visits * 2.78 pages/visits) per month, GitHub boasts over 2.7 billion (462.4M visits * 6 pages/visits). This translates to Codeberg having roughly 0.1% of GitHub's traffic.
If Codeberg aims to reach even 10% of GitHub's traffic, the operational costs would likely increase by a factor of 100 or much more ( almost certain ). Has Codeberg internally addressed this scalability challenge and outlined strategies for managing such growth? What are Codeberg's long-term goals in terms of user base and features, and how do they plan to balance these aspirations with sustainability?
Thank you.
Why? If you want to support it, do so. If it collapses, change some git repository URLs in your READMEs.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Registered_association_(German...
Are there any successful precedents for this model ?
No, you can donate: https://docs.codeberg.org/improving-codeberg/donate/
Codeberg e.V. is a non-profit.
What a dumb policy.
(The other identifier necessary to make SEPA transfers being the BIC = bank id.)
IBAN is the International Bank Account Number.
For membership fees you can also use direct bank transfer.
It would be, if it were true.
The latter works everywhere you can make a normal international bank transfer. It's just manual, while SEPA Direct Debit is automatic payment.