Artificial systems don't replace humans. There aren't processing facilities chopping us up for parts. Artificial systems don't kill jobs as the function remains.

Artificial systems provide a value incentive that could be realigned with humans. That would be beyond difficult as there are so many downsides to hiring humans, but it could happen.

I posit that this will be the same fight as inhouse tech versus outsourcing tech. Eventually, whatever mechanism is implemented will prove to have a negative value for the company. Realignment will occur and the coin will flip to the other side. Inhouse becomes outsourced or outsourcing becomes inhouse. It's inevitable.

The same is inevitable with artificial systems versus human intervention. Flip.