Uh-Oh: A story of SpaghettiOs and forgotten history
snackstack.net
snackstack.net
I never really lived in the time when those aluminum trays were a thing though. What were some of the big negatives, other than the obvious cost aspect? Durability? I guess microwavable issues?
I'm probably an odd-ball though. If there's oven directions, I almost always go with those. Usually more evenly heated, things can be crispier instead of just soggy, etc. My countertop convection oven heats up pretty quick and uses its fan to cool off pretty fast as well when done, so I can often get a set it and forget it kind of deal reheating frozen foods in it once I dial in the time/temp on convection mode for whatever dish I'm making.
I also tend to let a lot of my pre-made frozen foods thaw in the fridge the day before cooking to speed up cooking times. Once again that usually takes some trial and error to dial in the cook times as the packaging pushes you to keep the food frozen until cooking.
Thank you; I'm with you! I'm not sure I could even bring myself to buy one over it. (I decided not to on cost vs savings basis before having to make that choice, since time to preheat isn't something I generally care about so that's not a benefit to me.)
I hear you on the convection oven, but the real game changer for me was moving into a house with a double oven. The top oven heats very quickly but can fit a half sheet.
I just recently got an Anova Precision Oven (which has steam injection in addition to otherwise just being a really good and consistent convection oven) and literally everything I reheat now just tastes fantastic.
But IME even with a good microwave a lot of frozen meals tend to reheat somewhat unevenly with the default directions even with a rotating tray. I do admit I've never used a microwave where the magnetron moves though.
You can't put aluminum in the microwave...
And if you can't microwave a frozen dinner, good luck trying to sell it.
I remember the "Chinese" one (just above the SpaghettiOs) as being especially vile.
Except in Sicily, where this type of pasta is traditionally called anelli.
Which, to be fair, are circular.
It was okay to compliment women positively on their 'looks' in news articles in the 1950s who ever they were. It was even okay to use that in a teaser vignette of an article, the opening part that is to capture readers. Or a photo caption.
The author claims to find this depressing, but I'll wager Betty Ossola did not. No crime was committed here, and the publicity helped her brand. Even the silliest gaffe of all, a headline that crows that she has "has a Husband", seems something the Husband would rib her about and (nevertheless) was positive in nature. What if the headline said "is yet unmarried"? Still positive.
To find offense in historical things too often people have to imagine some entire upside-down world they think would have been a better world, and imagine that many things that are the result of what they perceive as 'comments of negative value' simply rather have been left unsaid. A lot of positivity in the world simply not there, and people just didn't say as much in that pretend-world.
"The past is a different country, people do things differently there." ~ L. P. Hartley
The present depresses me sometimes as well. There has always been a cultural contingent that follows the First Lady as a fashion icon and even an independent spirit and even awards self-praise for the idea for disconnecting their attention to her with the husband's politics. And follows her charity outreach and autonomous actions. It actually expresses respect for women with these political confines.
All until Melania Trump. The first First Lady it was okay to hate and to ignore. And she received attention (and out of context misreporting) for wearing a shirt that said "I don't care, do u?" which was directly about the media phenomenon that was so sudden in our history. She felt personally stung by it and still holds her head high. And she has the 'looks' too!
I would like to see if Betty Ossola can become a Wikipedia article, I'll work on it in my spare time.
I don't know, there was lots of hate and dislike for Nancy Reagan and Hilary Clinton. Seems like a lot of people thought "Just say no" was pretty asinine and out of touch.
And FWIW, I think she deserved the coverage she did wearing the "I don't care, do u?" jacket. Sure, whatever, she meant it to be pointed towards left-wing haters and wasn't supposed to be directed towards the immigrant child separation crisis. But there's a time and place to make a statement like that. Wear it at some fundraising dinner or other public event, not in some place where you're going to visit an ongoing humanitarian crisis. Not when there's such a massive chance for that statement to get misunderstood.
Wear a jacket with the message all you want. But timing and context of the message matters.
Even if I were an anarchist, I wouldn’t wear a “let’s burn it all down” jacket to the site of a massive fire either. Sometimes your message is less important than paying attention to your surroundings, especially as the First Lady.
So yes, she deserved all the anger headed in her direction for that stunt, but the jacket wasn’t the issue. The context, timing, and absolute tone-deafness was.
There was no _crisis_ I’m sorry your media did that to you and the potion of the population they whipped into a frenzy. I still remember the journalists using pictures from the previous administration. Effective propaganda to say the least.
Quite telling you think the government separating children from their families and losing track of a lot of them isn't considered a crisis. I don't care who does it, it's bad policy and losing them is unacceptable.
Also, while "kids in detention facilities" happened in other administrations, the direct tactic of specifically separating families with no intention of later reunification was something unique to the Trump administration. The "kids in cages" during the Obama administration came across the border unaccompanied, the Trump policy was to separate families and then not tell the families where their kids were.
I'm sorry you don't have the humanity enough to see the policy of child separation is wrong. I'm sorry your media brainwashing led you to think the cages built during the Obama administration was used for the exact same policies as the Trump administration, because they weren't.
Right, under Trump the kids were being used as pawns to get unknown non family members into the US hence the DNA testing and subsequent separation. There was a large influx of children being trafficked and abused in such manner.
Biden ended Trump unaccompanied minor law and stopped rapid DNA testing.
https://www.newsweek.com/joe-bidens-reversal-trumps-border-b...
https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/us-detention-child-migrants
https://www.fairus.org/legislation/executive/biden-administr...
The child separation crisis was sparked by a zero tolerance policy for adults crossing the border. This meant if anyone crossed the border, even legitimate parents, the parents would immediately be sent to jail and the kids separated. So even if a DNA test would prove you were the parents, your children were taken from you. You were not told where your kids were. There was no plans on how to reunite these families after.
The government was so disorganized in this process they actually lost the documentation of which kids were whose. There are still children Trump separated that have not been reunited with their families from this program, six years later, largely due to either the incompetence or malice of the Trump administration's record keeping. The government seems to have even lost kids and somehow aren't even sure exactly how many kids they detained in this process.
I'm sorry your media programming is preventing you from understanding the actual child separation crisis that happened which was committed by the Trump administration. This was the crisis for which Melania flew to Texas. It is pretty incredible to have someone accuse others of "media programming" when they don't even have basic knowledge of the topic at hand due to their own media sources white-washing atrocities and suggesting separating families with no plans for reunification by default for misdemeanor crimes is a good thing.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_administration_family_...
Where does this say anything about DNA testing programs that were ended by the Biden administration? This program was ended before Biden was even elected. Unless you're trying to argue Biden was able to end a federal program in June 2018. I thought Trump was president in 2018, but maybe that's just my media programming.
Huh, weird. Just looking at the page said "Substack" to me, but apparently the characteristic Substack styling has been intentionally carried over after the author has deliberately left Substack.
Which boggles my mind, since default Wordpress styling looks much better than Substack's center-of-the-page styling.
Dumb question for the folks with kids: how are they indoctrinating the kiddos these days? I remember SpaghettiOs ads from Saturday morning and after school cartoons. Do kids even still do those things?
N.b.: all the people in my life with kids are weird. Delightfully weird, but weird nonetheless. I feel totally out of touch with anyone I might describe as a mainstream parent.
A large percentage of the world is not American
TikTok and Youtube shorts.