https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10151227/
If you ask me, plastic is the new lead.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10151227/
If you ask me, plastic is the new lead.
Plastics are still probably bad (with a prior that most synthetic chemicals we're exposed to are known to be toxic and not "proven" to be so and actually banned for 20-100 years), but a cellular study showing that plastics damage those cells isn't very convincing on its own.
Your linked study is a little broader, but it mostly summarizes studies with grandiose ideas or those summarizing those sorts of "poke a cell and find it doesn't like being poked" experiments I initially derided.
Whether or not they did, it's still a necessary part of the discussion.
But it can have its utility too, it's just more "defense from morons" instead "advancing the field". Or more neutrally filling in very predictable gaps in knowledge, like if you got something really unexpected but this stuff is all bog standard unhappy cells
Much plastic dust in my environment is from car tires.
Both my neighbors solve problems with their roofs with disintegrating, $50 plastic tarps from Home Depot, filling my back yard with plastic. Multi million dollar homes in San Francisco!
What am I really supposed to do? Speaking of lead, it's not like the city has forced anyone to replace the exterior lead paint or lead pipes.
You are right, but if it's lead, it's bad news. The problem isn't that pollution is unknown, the problem is that the middle-aged members of my community, maybe every community, fucking suck as soon as something costs them a fucking dime.
There's no need for prejudice, be it skin colour or age. Cheap and corner cutting exists across the entire spectrum of humanity.