I think most of the folks overlook one key point - which is the fact that this was free publicity for Oracle. Some would say in a bad way, but that is if you think purely from ability to use/improve open source software(which I agree). However I also feel Oracle was in this not just from that angle but also to show to the world that they are the owners of Java(sort of). When they bought Sun, in essence they did become owners of Java (in a way). But this case has probably done more to broadcast this message that than they could have done using ads. Most of the folks know Oracle as the database company - this case helped broadcast Java linkage of Oracle. As they say, sometimes bad publicity is better than no publicity(you reach audience which you would never reach or need to spend lot of money to get similar results).