Europe's biggest problem: It is falling way behind America's powerhouse economy
washingtonpost.com
washingtonpost.com
And cultures... And this ain't gonna change any time soon...
This puts native speakers at and advantage. We're talking billions of people on this planet. The tech that OpenAI recently demoed, allows real time translation of pretty much any language to any other language. Babelfish just stopped being science fiction. On a side note, somebody needs to productize a fish shaped bluetooth earbud.
Anyway, that enables a whole range of people that are currently hard to interact with because they don't speak English well, or at all, to interact with quite literally anyone on the planet that speaks something that LLMs can make sense of. Even people only speaking relatively obscure dialects or languages. That's going to have an effect on international trade and other exchanges. Not speaking English is going to stop being a hurdle.
And likewise, LLMs can make it easier to navigate bureaucracy and deal with other local customs and procedures. I live in the EU.
Different SKUs for each country. It's just a nightmare to try and buy something in Europe
I had to learn English to use computers. It was hard. Fallout games helped a lot. I played with a dictionary by my side. Soon we will all learn chinese to do the same (and read relevant scientific articles).
It's not an open free flowing market like people might think it is. It makes it less competitive
This is an unpopular take that will probably give me a few downd00ts but the reasoning is obvious to anyone that knows how executives think.
Businesses are like water, they will go the path of least resistance to make a buck up to and including going to low labor rights locales.
No wonder we're falling behind, progress requires investment. And our rich elites are too stingy to actually invest into progress, they more like to invest into lobbying in order to keep the status quo.
Europe has its own equivalent of the IRA in the form of the European Green Deal, that should be doing something.
What do facebook and similar tech giants, which contribute significantly to US GDP, really, actually, contribute to our collective wealth, as in improved material living conditions and capacity?
PS The original title "Why Europe is falling way behind America’s powerhouse economy" is much better and more concise. In fact the edited title actually confused me in the beginning.
> Otherwise please use the original title, unless it is misleading or linkbait; don't editorialize.
They could have not consented to the eastwards NATO expansion in the first place, that does not serve anything in having peace in europe. But LNG from the US is a quite lucrative business, plus having a weaker and less competitive european economy. Their incompetence and inability to make any trace of proper foreign policy that is not just summarised just being dragged behind the US foreign policy is a major factor that fuels the far right rise last years.
> The wealthiest 10% of Americans own 93% of stocks even with market participation at a record high
https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/stock-market...
Europeans live better lives at the cost of being ridiculed line doesn’t go up.
The convicted felon can schtoop a pornstar while signing an executive order exiting NATO and promising to build gulags for his enemies, it doesn't matter. All that matters is the perception, and perception is all about marketing.
US GDP, broadly speaking, is the broken window theory. Europe delivers better quality of life, cheaper, based on the objective metrics.
“Price is what you pay, value is what you get.”
If those things aren’t important than yeah, it’s not the right measure.
How do you think those things are paid for? Fairy dust?
And you call me uneducated?
Peak HN in this comment!
So you're still comparing like to like.
And your example of 3% "skimming" ignores that most of that fee gets kicked back to consumers.
GDP is precisely one such imagined quantities that could easily be 10x more or less depending on who's doing the valueing.
Europe is not one country, nor is it just the EU, which itself is not a federation (people abroad seem to keep somewhat ignoring this important aspect). For the time being, we're not united under one flag, it's just a symbol of peace really. We're (mostly) happy neighbors, despite all the issues, despite proclamations by EU leaders on CNN.
These are the movers and shakers. Any barrier to entry for people creating businesses and selling products to the public is a innovation murderer.
Big companies are bureaucratic morasses that have very difficult time adjusting to change. They have figured out how to do something successful enough once to get big, but as time moves on the behavior that lead to profitability 20 years ago leads to bankruptcy now.
This is why they rely on buying small businesses for new products and different approaches.
If it is hard and dangerous to start new ventures and be able to find and hire the right people and fire the wrong ones then you are going to have a society with very little in the way of actual innovation.
Big governments love big corporate businesses. It is a lot easier to manipulate and regulate a handful of big businesses then it is for thousands of mostly anonymous unknown businesses that come and go on a yearly basis. But you need that unregulated chaos and competition for innovation to happen.
The US has created a lot of inflation through its defense budget, things like the inflation reduction act (which added a trillion $ or so to the economy, which is ironic), etc. And people commonly take loans to buy cars, houses, etc. Which all adds to inflation. It creates a lot of money but not a lot of wealth or well being.
Which is why despite being so rich, poverty levels are substantial in the US, medical care is expensive/unaffordable, and illness is a potential bankrupting event for a lot of people. Life expectancy is low and dropping (relative to other countries). Literacy and education levels are at an all time low and obesity is a national decease associate with a class of people that don't have good access to quality produce or health care.
That was the aim. EU had started to become a nail in the back of US so US is working on it.
Well, it could be worse, I guess - we could be Canada.
Take the dollar, for instance. One of the major reasons it is still dominance reserve currency is because major contracts in other countries often peg the value of the contract to the dollar rather then local currency. Even if the contracts have nothing to do with international trade or USA. The reason for this is because the local currencies are far more likely to fluctuate in value thus putting long term projects at financial risk.
This sort of thing isn't so much because central bankers in USA are brilliant, but more to do with that central bankers in other countries are far stupider.
Since the 1970s the USA financial policy is one of exporting debt in exchange for importing goods. Bizzarely the rest of the world has allowed this to work. The upside is that this allows Americans to benefit from making foreign goods much cheaper for essentially nothing. The downside is that it has made industry in the USA much more unprofitable and thus annihilating it.
But it continues to work. China continues to use financial manipulation and central control of the economy to produce massive amounts of goods at a great loss to the wealth and well being of the Chinese people, which keeps the USA economy afloat. EU is obsessed with protectionist policies and using their economy to project "soft power" in a bid to maintain some semblance of European Empire-era policy controls over its former colonies... which makes it even less competitive then USA industry. So much so that it is fairly likely that in 50 years people will be trying to go from Europe to Africa to get jobs.
This isn't what winning looks like. The reason why USA seems like a powerhouse economy compared to EU is because its leaders don't fail as badly.