I don’t know what the fuck Patagonia thinks they’re doing switching to recycled polyester to make their clothing more environmental.
I don’t know what the fuck Patagonia thinks they’re doing switching to recycled polyester to make their clothing more environmental.
Or it can be recycled, in which case most of the plastic in the net is fixed into a new physical object.
The second one seems better to me than the first one. Do you disagree? Or is your objection to the continued use of plastics in clothing at all?
Using recycled materials of any sort reduces the consumption of new materials. This is a net positive for the environment, absent any extremes in the use of recycled materials. (i.e. extreme energy consumption or harmful chemicals used in the recycling process)
Cotton is what most people think of as a natural fiber, and even its use can entail a high environmental cost.
We need a few more decades of inflation before anyone can rightly claim to become a billionaire without fucking people over.
> Virtue: Positive trait or quality deemed to be morally good
Saints were certainly concerned with virtues.
I stated at the outset that this is not a popular opinion.