How the hell does releasing one audio codec undo years and years of privacy nightmare, being a willing bystander in an actual genocide, experimenting with the emotions of depressed kids, and collusion to depress wages?
I wish the author could see that, and if the case is valid, to provide it, instead of some pretty tenuous claims of connection strung together to lead up to a demand for money.
I did try to go to the link that evidenced the "multiple" times Facebook was contacted in a 5 year period, but I couldn't get through. How many times was it, for anyone who can?
Read the report, gather data, then criticize it.
This is the core of your point and a comment on the idea itself, not the way the article portrayed it. I think it's fare to characterize your dismissal as glib.
compare that to Angular and TensorFlow, such a difference in culture
And GraphQL, Relay, Stylex...
Ah yes, the <body id="app"></body> websites.
Look, I'm seeing an increase of blogs made with an implication that _infinity_ amount of visits requires less resources than one and I don't just find it true.
(https://github.com/facebook/zstd/blob/dev/CONTRIBUTING.md#co...)
The linker? How is facebook involved in that?
Good luck undoing that releasing codecs haha
[0] https://time.com/4930532/facebook-russian-accounts-2016-elec...