The part to me that I see as surprising is dismissal of the stress of taking VC money and being a founder. It is a job thats incredibly demanding. Which is eye opening to me that that's how people see it.
If it was so easy why aren't there more of them and more companies?
Early employee is tough - unless the company is on a significant trajectory the options should be valued at zero. That said being an early employee has other benefits such as being part of an interesting team and work problem. Definitely not a cushy job though (and nor is a founder) - both are significantly hard and for a certain personality type.
Everyone else go join a FANGG and get paid if thats what you are looking for comfy life benefits.
Founders generally need to go down with the ship, early employees do not. If the growth trajectory starts to falter after 1.5-3 years, just get out of there and try another company. Let the founders clean it up (and you have equity in case they do).
Sounds like you're dismissing the idea that being an early employee is hard.
^^ Literally in my comment.
So, you're saying that it's hard but "not that hard actually".
However my original comment was pushback about how easy it is to take VC money (comments I have seen) and how low-risk being a founder is - which is patently false.
Wait, is this a serious question? The limiting factor is VC money, of course.
It also pissed off some investors, so everyone is pissed off - I might write about something a bit more positive next time :D