>The merger should have never been authorized.
So that Verizon could own the entire market along with a few also-rans? It was a choice between the lesser of two evils.
So that Verizon could own the entire market along with a few also-rans? It was a choice between the lesser of two evils.
You don't fix a monopoly by creating more monopolies.
I am not familiar with the telecom market. But blocking mergers doesn’t necessarily increase competition. (For example, breaking up Walmart would reduce competitive pressure on Amazon.)
In addition to out-and-out opposition or agreement that sounds vaguely oppositional, a comment might call for a pedantic annotation, a tangential aside or book recommendation.
sudo !!You know what they say about things that aren't falsifiable, they're definitely correct!!
Ah, the ol' Hitchens's movie night: "what can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed with popcorn".
By creating actual competition. Sprint and T-Mobile separately would always be second tier to Verizon. Combined, their network actually competes.