Valley gender gap a death spiral
sfgate.com
sfgate.com
Unless their parents are engineers, girls also aren't likely to encounter coders in their own lives the same way they would, for example, a doctor or a teacher. "We don't really have that same kind of interaction with software engineers as we go about our daily lives," Goldfein said.
Neither of my parents were engineers (uneducated truck/bus drivers actually) and I never interacted with engineers growing up. So... simply "being male" was my influence to be an engineer? I call bullshit.
Some people are generally more predisposed to some fields than others anyway, so it's hard to extrapolate your anecdotal experience into a full counterargument against her story.
Agreed... perhaps this is another possible influence on the gender gap. But isn't a lot of this anecdotal?
Edit: I found out about computers in school. I don't recall what grade.. somewhere in the 5th to 7th grade probably. I don't recall my middle school being male-centric but I suppose it could have been and I never noticed. I wanted to be a computer repairman after my sister told me about the nice guy that came to fix the copier in her office. He dressed nice. Kind of funny now that I'm where I am now. I don't like to dress up. :)
There are historical female role models: Madame Curie, Grace Hopper, and Ada Lovelace probably the top three (and for a modern one, how about the founder of Adafruit? and so on and so forth). Showing their wiki pages to any young females, if the topic comes up, is a helpful contribution IMO.
I'm also of the opinion that there's a hint of arrogance in saying that men are the reason there are fewer women in the field. I generally take a feminist stance with these things, and am of the opinion that women's jobs being at the mercy of chauvinistic 'brogrammers' or some such bullshit is exactly that: bullshit.
Given the desire and the determination, any woman interested in the field can pursue a career in it, and the field does not prevent that.
> "For Yeung, having parents who were both engineers spared her the sense that computers weren't for girls."
This conveys the real truth, hiding in the mound of rubbish that is the majority of that article.
It's not Silicon Valley's fault; it's not the fault of technology, or programming; it's not the fault of the men working in those fields. It's society's fault for dictating what qualifies as 'girly', and what doesn't. Tech is not 'girly', therefore society fails to provide the same incentives to pursue those interests to young girls, that are available to young boys.
I agree... there was another good comment along these lines in another thread on this topic earlier today:
http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4061749
If the engineering gender gap is an issue we are going to address as a society, then we need to address it at its roots: childhood social pressures.
http://www.techrepublic.com/blog/programming-and-development...
The article makes some fair points that are right on target. There is a significant disparity between the number of "hacker" types with regards to gender.
Frankly, I think the article is saying we need more of this:
this contradicts the evidence that social network use is mostly from girls