My favorite 1980's Canadian TV show: Bits and Bytes
omarshehata.substack.com
omarshehata.substack.com
Also here’s my favourite. The look on Morgan’s face when he delivers the punch line of the sketch is one of such supreme satisfaction.
Happens to be that Abbott and Fergusen are alumni of my high school (where they met).
It's like Robin Williams teaching a subject with a straight face... You want the comedy to flow.
[1] https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLOtimvwAoYtnCtLiLspq_Gnng...
[2] https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLOtimvwAoYtlWZdX-MgnHrr-G...
During one of the live shows, demonstrating e-mail, the e-mail account was hacked, probably the first hack captured on TV: https://www.vice.com/en/article/9ak7w5/as-seen-on-tv-when-ha...
Fantastic show for sure.
This guy is an expert technology communicator for a non-tech crowd, even today.
Youtube killed the TVO star.
But going through those videos made me wistful. It was like Mr. Wizard (of whom I was also a fan back then): concise, friendly, encyclopedic explanations of both how to do things with the computers of the day, and of how the machines actually worked. For example, explaining the CPU as a little filing clerk inside the machine who receives instructions on what to do with the numbers stored in the vast array of numbered filing cabinets (i.e., the RAM). The videos interposing the bits with Luba and Billy also had a lovely early-80s "analog aesthetic", akin to Sesame Street.
It was weird to see computers we didn’t have access to (most Brasilian ones were TRS, Sinclair, and Apple II compatibles. No PET and no PCs just yet. And no Xerox 820 either.
Here is an translated interview with Wolfgang Back [2] about the early days.
[1] https://de.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolfgang_Back
[2] https://sceneworld.org/blog/2019/07/23/video-interview-with-...
They had an 'interactive website' years before YouTube existed, and the format intentionally had a lot of internet crossover. They clearly had no idea what they were doing half the time, and it was wonderful.
Whenever people reminisce about the early internet, I think of this show as a pioneer in 'new media'.
Richard Feynman lecture on computing https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EKWGGDXe5MA
I am a great admirer of Feynman and overall appreciate what he has done to explain physics and the scientific approach to the public. In this case, I wonder why he agreed to the interview at all.
Robert Frost addressed some of this is "Education by Poetry." I don't pretend to grok all of his talk but he talks about how we use metaphor to explain and understand but that metaphor has its limitations [1].
"Another metaphor that has interested us in our time and has done all our thinking for us is the metaphor of evolution. Never mind going into the Latin word. The metaphor is simply the metaphor of the growing plant or of the growing thing. And somebody very brilliantly, quite a while ago, said that the whole universe, the whole of everything, was like unto a growing thing. That is all. I know the metaphor will break down at some point, but it has not failed everywhere."
[1] https://www.poetrysoup.com/poetry/resources/documents/educat...
One of the first shows that we let our kid watch. The trucks have voices (sort of of) but mostly it’s just a narrator describing what machines do while they calmly do machine stuff.
all my old favorite shows: little hamster show, wishbone, whatamess, dragonball z , gunda wing, uh-oh (my friend was a contestant), video arcade top 10
and the most iconic of all: The Zone
Reminded me of an old NBC interview with Frank Herbert that ended up in my Youtube feed a few days ago. (https://youtu.be/26GPaMoeiu4) It's pretty wild just how different the tone, language and content is to what you expect to see on big platforms or channels nowadays.
I've been shopping for a C=64 for my kid.
Here's what happens, society chugs along just fine until a catastrophic event like an EMP which effectively drops them back into the Stone Age, except even worse because many people have jobs with skill sets that don't really serve a purpose outside of the modern capitalistic economy.
You are missing out not doing that; things seem like magic until you do them. Sure building a processor yourself won’t have all the branch prediction and etc as your intel/m* has, but at least you understand how it could work. Same for gpus ; you won’t be making anything close to what the state of the art is, but you’ll understand how it gets there.
But this way of thinking can also be applied to other industries. What ends up happening is that specialization forms. There are still (young even) people that get into low level languages, including assembler when optimizations require it (though compilers just keep getting better).
There’s also the inevitable back and forth between abstraction, then a reversal to simplify and remove layers. You had low level (binary/assembler) higher (C), higher (java JRE, python/perl/JS and other interpreted languages) and now there’s interest in Rust, which is a bit of a modern twist on lower level programming.
You see this back and forth elsewhere. Computing work used to be done on the server side (mainframes), then distributed out to individual computers, and then back to the cloud, and next (LLMs maybe)?