Aka give me one OR guy and a gurobi license and we will beat their result.
Bonus at the end of the excercise you will have an or guy that can help you solve other use cases as well.
Aka give me one OR guy and a gurobi license and we will beat their result.
Bonus at the end of the excercise you will have an or guy that can help you solve other use cases as well.
And according to the PR they did not use gurobi (or any sota mip solver), just their in-house lp solver in combination with shortest path algorithms and the fix-and-optimize heuristic.
Likely your particular use case will not fit their model anyway (for example you may want to consider contracts of affreighent along with leasing entire vessels).
So yes, or scientist and gurobi will definitely win.
This is just a PR article, it's hard to say what they did or didn't try before arriving at this solution.
Academics care about proving optimality. Businesses care about their own specific use case and not synthetic benchmarks.
This does not align with my experience of people working in OR.
I benchmarked OR-Tools extensively vs e.g. LKH3 + my own hand-written solvers ... it's not a remotely credible library for these things, last time I checked. So ... don't have a lot of faith in Google's offerings here.
http://vrp.galgos.inf.puc-rio.br/index.php/en/updates - where's Google?