I don't think there's a strict "blub" hierarchy. Lisp excels on several axes of flexibility and keeping your OODA loop[1] small. The APL and ML families each have some cool things that Lisp doesn't do as well (though a subset of those cool things have been implemented in Lisp as libraries; see earlier point about flexibility). Once my kids are a bit older, I'd love to try out Pony because it seems to have some cool things. Of course the Blub paradox means that as a Lisp programmer, I won't always know when Lisp is Blub.

1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OODA_loop To a certain extent this is tooling, but CL, at least (I can't speak for other members of the Lisp family) was designed with a peculiar combination of dynamism and efficiency in mind that nobody else does. It's in many ways more dynamic than Python and yet easier to write an efficient compiler for, which is quite the feat.