(corrected my c&p mistake with the mini, thanks)
(corrected my c&p mistake with the mini, thanks)
https://www.geekbench.com/doc/geekbench6-benchmark-internals... (page 18)
"Randomly" picking
14900K 215.3 Klines/sec
7950x 230.3 Klines/sec
M2 Ultra 233.9 Klines/sec
M3 Max 196.5 Klines/secM3 Max: 3898
7950x: 2951
The ST advantage of Apple Silicon is real. 7950x does do better in highly parallel tasks.
To me, Apple Silicon is clearly leading clients over AMD/Intel. Hence, my original reason for why AMD's announcement isn't "exciting". Because Apple Silicon is so far ahead in client.
Of course, AMD can crank up the core via Epyc/Threadripper and Apple has no answer. For that, you'd need to look into ARM chips from Ampere/Amazon for a competitor.
A 7950x system at IDLE uses 50% more power than an M3 Max going all-out on a CPU workload.
https://www.guru3d.com/review/amd-ryzen-9-7950x-review/page-...
(Even phoronix is scares and mostly focuses on laptops - I have no laptop)