(I miss the old PC era where the world at large was benefiting in tandem from new things happening (or falling behind from not adapting)).
Except we call it "cloudframe" now.
I think their "consumer GPU" did so bad recently that AMD could just as well, you know, simply liquidate the "consumer GPU" division and stop pretending.
I'm in the "consumer GPU" market myself; what AMD GPU do I buy today? -- Radeon Pro VII, launched in 2020 and the best AMD consumer GPU I can find today.
It's such a divide. I could optimize my software for such powerful GPUs as the Mi300 line.. but why do that, given that probably I won't even see one such GPU in my lifetime.
And they announced a workstation version with 48GB: https://www.phoronix.com/news/AMD-Radeon-PRO-W7900-Dual-Slot
Paper launches aren't anything new. It's always been a thing especially in hardware.
That's not new. Replace hyperscalers with crypto miners and we've had a similar situation for a while.
That's news to crypto miners.
The only ones left standing are the small ones and most of them are just using what they already purchased.
There is no liquidity in the shitcoins to be able to support daily large dumps of their tokens and unless you have almost free power, there is zero profitability.
Why not? Because they’re sold out to hyperscalers?
they're 15k - who exactly is disappointed they won't be able to buy one?
Just a few weeks ago I spoke to someone who shelled out $10k for running LLM's locally. I've seen more expensive builds as well.
HPC centers and research clusters.