The rebranding from Twitter to X, then, has been more successful than anticipated. It should have been X Windows that one mistook the topic for.

I'm just going to keep calling it Twitter.

Usually, I will call people however they preferred to be called, even when it seems silly.

But renaming Twitter to "X" crosses the line of confusing. I'm not sure it should've been allowed.

Me too. It makes very general points but it could apply to Twitter, which is IMHO what makes this so ambiguous. The fact that X is actually slower than I think it could be (remember the "light" version that didn't need JS at all?) adds to that ambiguity.

Same, I kept thinking "Are there really that many people still on Twitter to make it slow or do they just lack funding for infra".

Me too. I'm not sure I would have clicked if the tagline weren't, effectively, clickbait.

What did you think after the first two sentences?

Is the post not deliberately ambiguous for humorous effect?