Netflix queue + Rotten Tomatoes = A Better Queue
abetterqueue.com
abetterqueue.com
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/dvd/netflix/
-------------------------------------------
Edit:
The rottentomatoes version also returns way more results (given the same parameters) -
Abetterqueue: http://abetterqueue.com/movies?utf8=%E2%9C%93&query[rati...
2 results
-------------------------------------------
Rotten Tomatoes:
75%+, Action Adventure, 2010-2012
29 results
Is there a technical reason for this or is this a bug?
Technical. A Better Queue's database currently takes in only the first genre listed for a movie from the Netflix API. So those other 235 Gay and Lesbian movies are present in A Better Queue, but in other genres. The choice to only take in the first genre listed from the Netflix API was that, beyond trying to keep it simple, the first genre seemed like the most accurate one. The choice was in no way intended to be exclusionary.
I would be able to take in multiple genres during a database load so that each movie could show up for all of its genres. So I will. Right now I'm waiting to hear back from Rotten Tomatoes' API team so I can get a second API key for development. (Using my production key to test new functionality would put me over my API call limit.)
Aside from that, I don't have any critiques - clearly there's more that can be done, but already this is an excellent product! I will certainly be using it to help me decide what to watch :)
ADDENDUM::
I'm somewhat new to all of this. Right now I'm learning BDD principles. So, I'm going to use A Better Queue as a learning tool and blog about BDDing new features, like an 'add to instant queue' button. I'll probably blog here: http://abetterqueue.blogspot.com/
After that, I'll re-write ABQ using BDD principles and then I'll open-source the thing.
Cheers, Dave
I'm not sure what kind of graphic would be best. A meter like the Tomatometer would be the most accurate, but it might be too big or too long and narrow to fit well within the space you have for each movie. Other possibilities are a square that fills from the bottom up, a circle that fills in radially, and a circle that fills in with a smaller circle. (If you go with something 2D instead of 1D, like a circle filling with a circle, make sure to avoid a classic mistake by scaling the area of the sub-shape, not the width or radius.)
I would add a "select all" button next to the "clear" button.
I would also put the number of results returned underneath the "filter" button, something like, "15 movies found". This would help one narrow a large data set without having to scroll to the bottom of the page to determine if too many movies are returned.
I would also have a "new releases" checkbox in genres and make that the default.
I would also change the caption on the "filter" button to "find". "Filter" is confusing because it assumes there is a full set already returned. Most users, I believe, think they start with zero results, then "find" titles based on their search criteria.
From a UI perspective - I'd reverse the slider so that it goes from highest rating to lowest and most recent to oldest. Most people will likely want the highest, most recent films.
Now, start working on the real estate site that will allow me to find homes based on price, location, school ratings, jobs, days of sunshine and crime rating. This site should allow a national search and also allow the user to assign weights to the various criteria. Presenting the result of a search as a heat map would also be helpful.
I would enhance the 2nd bar to make one handle be able to push the other when they meet instead of getting stuck.
Does Tomatoes not rate animes much? Filtering from '95 to today of 50%+ only returned 3.
I would imagine that it's similar for the vast majority of foreign films as well.
- allow sorting by rating, year, title
- allow switching between "All Critics" and "Top Critics" ratings
- show additional movie information (summary, etc.) on hover for desktop users
very cool, great work!
even still, this is a great way to view movies - nice work!
'Professional' critics suck.