This question unfairly frames the situation at Meta. It presumes that the company’s reputation has irreparably declined, and implies Zuckerberg's hobbies detract from the leadership of a company he owns in every sense of the word.

Meta, like any large organization, faces complex challenges and public scrutiny. It’s misleading to focus solely on the negative aspects without acknowledging the positive contributions and efforts to address these issues.

Leaders can and do have personal lives and interests outside their professional responsibilities. Suggesting that his hobbies indicate a lack of commitment to Meta is an ad hominem attack.