Amazon execs may be personally liable for tricking users into Prime sign-ups
arstechnica.com
arstechnica.com
I signed up for prime again last month to get faster shipping. Still took two days and more and more products on Amazon aren’t “prime” compatible and make you pay for shipping anyway so , cancelled again. See ya prime !
I’m seriously wondering if they’re A/B testing retention of prime users when they make the service worse.
It is very frustrating, and so I've swapped over to other sites for the great bulk of my online purchases. Now I make an Amazon purchase maybe 1–2 times per year, only for those rare things I can't find anywhere else.
Never ever again. What a dreadful firm. Nothing changed
Took only a few emails to get us of it, and reimburse the costs, fortunately.
"no" was maybe 5mm wide, with the other button taking up half the screen
and of course it signs you up immediately without confirmation
joke's on them though, after a couple of really, really bad customer experiences I've cut my Amazon spending so much that couple of times a year I do actually buy something they offer me another "free trial"
(which is then immediately cancelled)
The deactivation process is awful too - an obstacle course of dark patterns.
> personally liable
LOL, yeah, right.
Somewhere out there MBA programs are still teaching case studies about Amazon's "obsessive focus on the customer", oblivious to the fact that Amazon has been trash for years now.
It’s ’harvesting brand value’.
Whatever you're smoking it must be really strong. Can i have some ? /s
Execs hold liable ? Maybe in a parallel universe.