yeah, the assertion is entirely false. there doesn't need to be any such tradeoff.
there's probably a term for the cognitive fallacy where you assert that however it happens to be is how it had to be. it's like normalcy bias, but retroactive.
there's probably a term for the cognitive fallacy where you assert that however it happens to be is how it had to be. it's like normalcy bias, but retroactive.
Maybe you're right. I've certainly heard others make this claim. I just personally haven't seen a real-world example of this being true.