Hacker News Reader

Comment by KSteffensen | Hacker News Reader

First law implies that it is impossible to change a badly designed system into a well-designed system through incremental changes.

I disagree with this, it is certainly possible to improve the state of some system without starting from scratch.

View on HN

Agreed.

For example, once you have a good grasp of the codebase, and an overview of the future requirements, you can perform low-risks, local refactorings, so as to ease implementing both current and later features/bugfixes/etc.

The requirements aren't systematic though. Meaning, as a dev, you're not always, at least explicitly, allowed to get a bird-eye view, nor to act on it.

I don’t think it does - it only says badly designed is a more stable state. You can roll a boulder uphill in very small steps, as long as you can also keep it from rolling back down (analogous with other devs in your team/new requirements to implement).

I think we can look into the notion from complexity theory of attractor states. If you want to make a change, you need to shift your system enough that it moves into another state.

In more normal words - the codebase will fight your changes. And that means that small incremental changes may not be enough, and you will need at least a few big leaps.

Not impossible, no. But it it moving uphill, in the opposite direction to the path of least resistance.

Not just uphill, but also through thunder and flames.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com