Comment by vel0city | Hacker News Reader

Comment by vel0city | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

Jerry Nixon is one person, correct? Or is Jerry Nixon multiple people and also the official spokesperson for Windows? What other conferences did he speak at making that statement? What other official correspondence did Microsoft make stating it was the last version of Windows?

What part of my comment falls under the "no"? It was one guy (a Microsoft employee) stating one time at one conference speaking to a completely unrelated topic (Live Tiles). You think Jerry Nixon, a developer evangelist, was the kind of person authorized to make such a statement of "Windows 10 will be the last version of Windows" while giving a presentation on Live Tiles?

If a developer evangelist was giving a talk about bringing Clippy back to Word and how you can add your own prompts and they made the statement of "we're discontinuing Xbox", would you take that as an official statement of Microsoft's intentions?

>a Microsoft employee

So it was a Microsoft employee speaking in a conference being quoted by the press?

Yes. In a single comment that wasn't followed up with more explanation going on a tangent about how the Live Tile APIs will probably be around for a long time so go ahead and develop on them. He wasn't the kind of employee to speak as to such massive trends and make official statements of the future development of Windows overall. Everyone taking this as some statement of absolute fact just ran with that without even wondering what that meant or if the one employee might have been misinformed.

There's 300,000 employees at Microsoft. You think they're all on the same page of everything all the time? This employee wasn't there to speak about the future of Windows, just to showcase how to use the new functionality of Live Tiles. It wasn't some big meeting about the future of Windows by any measure.

There's a reason why often we hear a disclaimer "views are my own, not employer's".

A statement by an official employee has been made, it was widely publicized and never corrected. The onus to correct a false statement by an employee is on the company. With the amount of publicity, Microsoft definitely knew about this false advertisement, but did not want to correct it, because it was in Microsoft's interest for public to believe it was the official truth.

On top of that, the employee was an evangelist

Reply on news.ycombinator.com