Yet another project management SaaS
plan-b.today
plan-b.today
But the biggest thing for me is the lack of screenshots. This is text-heavy, and the text is pretty generic. For example:
> "Our project management SaaS stands out due to its emphasis on simplicity and structured configurations. Unlike numerous tools offering extensive customization options, we've prioritized key functionalities crucial for effective project management. This deliberate approach ensures a user-friendly experience while adhering to best practices. We aim to provide a streamlined, focused platform that simplifies project management processes, enabling teams to concentrate on tasks rather than getting lost in intricate configurations."
> "Dynamic Project Management: Plan B cuts through the chaos with intuitive project planning, real-time tracking, and seamless integration of all your resources. It's about bringing clarity and calm to the storm."
Okay. I'm sure JIRA and Asana also "aim to provide a streamlined, focused platform that simplifies project management processes, enabling teams to concentrate on tasks rather than getting lost in intricate configurations."
That's a lot of promises - which of these features have you implemented? Show me, don't just tell me what everyone else is also saying. Nobody sets out to build a convoluted, distracting project management tool.
Despite this, I logged in, and you actually have a working product, which is awesome! I think you should really showcase the most crucial features with screenshots and gifs instead of droning on and on about your philosophy.
Finally, and this is a smaller thing, but the landing page is sloppy. The headings are blurred out on the right. One of the subtitles is latin placeholder text ("Quis tellus eget adipiscing...")
> As an emergency birth control, sold under the brand names Plan B One-Step and Julie, among others, it is useful within 72 hours of unprotected sex.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levonorgestrel
—
Alternative name ideas:
- Canteengency (canteen of contingency)
- Othra (Bugzilla, Godzilla - Jira, Mothra - Othra)
- Plan C (simple, quirky, best of the above, only proving point)
But I think it's because of that which you're seeing a spike. Because those aspects are all comment worthy.
Text "What makes Plan B different" reads:
- Has polls - Has 360 surveys - Something about integrating tools
Pretty sure other tools have all that
The first thing is that the methodology is different than what you can use potentially be used too. No ceremony, no estimation and more
Second thing is that I am not trying to rob you with an abusive pricing
Last is that I recognize the value of open source and decided to redistribute half the benefit to it
- Your methology seems different, but I don't get/see that on your front page. What is different? Why is it different? And why is not everyone already doing it, if it's better? Try to focus your messages! Provide screenshot/short videos (GIF-style or so).
- You're probably not robbing me today. But why only 10$/month for everything if ithers can bill you the double amount per user? You're missing out tons of money people are ready to pay (I know that for sure, because people are already paying for it).
You could tell me, well it is the value as soon as someone pay for it? But do we have a choice? I just want to give that choice. I am even tempted to offer a pay for what you think it is worth.
If I am wrong in my idea, you'll see me raise the prices ;)
You might also want to update your copyright since we are now in 2024.
Yeah the gradient is definitely not great, thanks for feedbacks,
People not in America: 7714m
Some TLDs are trusted a bit more by different demographics but in no way the priority.
2. plan-b.com is also some sort of SaaS
Also, I own newyork.today for example... I think there is domains that the tld works with.
That said, the hyphen still looks bad and the name is an abortion pill in the US.
If content marketing and SEO is a part of the issue, being sure not to select a TLD that isn't penalized by google is important, as some TLDS (often the cheapest ones) have really bad reputations both for web, and sending spam.
.com doesn't need a weird name to be OK. Lots of ways to come up with a unique enough .com that sticks.