Steve Jurvetson's personal collection of Apollo Lunar Module parts
flickr.com
flickr.com
I hope that this collection finds its way to the public museums in the future where it can be maintained in perpetuity. The current curator seems to care deeply about it and it would be amazing if that continues for future generations.
Public museums are not bad per se, but they have a lot of disadvantages.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mO6F9CfgMg4
My summary of the argument:
* Modern museums tend to cater to the general public, which means interesting and unique pieces that are of primary importance to experts in the field are often not on display.
* Private collectors are often better at making their collections available in meaningful ways.
* The bulk of a museum's collection tends not to be displayed at any one time.
Of course, it's a risk if he were to transfer his collection to another private individual - a museum is the safer option. But I don't think the decision clear cut either.
Citation very much needed. The vast majority of items in private collections, including the entirety of the vast majority of private collections, are unknown, uncatalogued, and utterly unavailable.
Counterexample: The AGC they restored was sold and then never heard from again. Of course it must be said that they had the opportunity to restore it to begin with because it was privately owned. Although if you're into vintage computing, you'll see there's also museums who loan out pieces to youtubers to restore/make videos about.
The Smithsonian's Museum of History and Technology had some original ENIAC panels, powered up! You could push buttons and make them count. They had a huge collection of clock escapements, which they kept wound. An Atlas Guidance Computer with someone who operated it once an hour. The original Perceptron. Now it's the Museum of American History, and much simplified.
The fact that he did not shows that he just wanted tax breaks for his toys and is a great example of why private collections aren't great.
Instead, we make sure we have billionaires.
https://informal.jpl.nasa.gov/museum/content/jet-propulsion-...
There is also a request for information about an old Soviet data storage device which neither Steve nor Scott knew anything about.[1] If anyone has any ideas, I'm sure they would appreciate a comment or email.
[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pjoSCPIjVwg
kid in a candy store
Back in the Sixties the Russians already had two secret space stations in orbit with working machine guns: https://youtu.be/4FOF0f70Hoc?t=408
Very cool stuff.
I think the coolest things were:
A piece of the Hindenburg The lunar module computer The big rocket engine with the hand welded cooling tube making up the rocket nozzle. Truly amazing to see the workmanship up close.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/uPBt1z3UnLxoSx9P7
But I really liked the spacex honeycomb lander leg that I didn't see in the flickr set.
It's a truly amazing collection.
But his collection of space things? Oh, I'm green with envy!
um...
https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/2017/11/18/steve-jurvets...
Which, eh, in my mind, harassment deserves heavy consequences but that also necessitates being careful to differentiate.
So anyway, what do you think should happen to him? All his possessions seized? Life in prison?
"Those sources said DFJ’s external investigators at the law firm Simpson Thacher & Bartlett discovered from at least two women — who confirmed their accounts to Recode — that Jurvetson had allegedly carried out affairs with multiple women simultaneously. Some of the women also said they felt led on by the married man and were unaware of the other relationships." https://www.vox.com/2017/11/18/16647078/steve-jurvetson-dfj-...