Here we are, 8 years later and despite flashing crossing lights and the train, it failed to detect "train crossing ahead - stop" situation.
I get their probabilistic approach, but I don't see it passing the regulators.
When Starship explodes: "this was a success, we learnt a lot along the way".
This is the same here, yes there is an accident, but at the end this was a success because:
1) The accident didn't happen, so the safety measures worked (the "human driver").
2) Once the fix is deployed, if you look in the long run, over 100 years, it won't happen again, so potentially hundreds of saved lives.
And Tesla can claim: "Hey this is the driver's fault anyway".
Main difference between SpaceX and Tesla is that it is the user paying at the end of the day.
The abuse of language is inexcusable and Tesla should be penalized for the lies.
That is the reason why other OEMs test such things with trained professionals before it is released to the general public.
Maybe we whould apply such an approach to the question: `Should Elon Musk be in jail` ?
And, as with FSD, since a single bug can cause death, I think we should roll a thousand time, and throw him in jail should a single 'yes' appear.