I previously dug into Helen Toner’s history and listened to her talks at conferences on YouTube (including an Effective Altruism one) and read her interviews on other sites where she was strongly against GPT being released to the public. Then we have their behaviour and comments during the coup attempt and her temporary OpenAI CEO, Emmett Shear, she brought in who made a number of radical statements about wanting to cripple AI research before he was put forward as CEO and then he made an awkward, and very evasive, initial statement to employees that scared off many to Sam’s side. He too played coy about his intentions during that timeframe just like Helen avoided publicity despite being the spare, but her past states were revelatory. Not exactly someone’s opinion I trust.

This is just being spun as a moderate stance on AI regulation by people who IRL have much more aggressive and non mainstream takes on stopping AI development.

Which is why I ask who will be the caretaker in this scenario.

A paywall workaround was posted: https://archive.is/wbwC2. It would benefit a lot of commenters here if they actually read the article first.