Clipboard officially open to the public
blog.clipboard.com
blog.clipboard.com
* Make clip deletion central to the app. Should be right there with "visit". Easy cleanup.
* All the clips should be the same size. Right now I clipped the name of a book and it is twice as large as full webpages I want to revisit.
* I'm sure it's on your roadmap but I'd like to be able to share from within the chrome extension without having to go back to the app.
* Also I'm sure it's on your roadmap but search should search the pages content as well if possible.
* Probably also on your roadmap but my main problems with bookmarks as they stand now are twofold. Organization and rediscovery.
You have a good start solving the organization problem and the rediscovery problem due to the visual nature of your solution. But what I really want is some sort of reminder about old bookmarks that I haven't viewed in X amount of days.
For all non starred bookmarks keep a last viewed count. If it's over 90 days or some determined amount add it to the list of bookmarks that are expiring. Have a little icon similar to the push notification icons on iOS alerting me how many expiring bookmarks I have. Have a place to click to see them all. Provide super easy management to archive, star, or do nothing. Autoarchive after 180 days. Still keep these around and searchable but in an "expand to see archived bookmarks" portion.
Help me keep my bookmarks relevant. Please :)
Also, and this is not to be negative, but I have been burnt repeatedly by bookmarking/clip services going out of business and while I wish you the best of luck a _key_ aspect of trying a new one is that they do not act as a roach motel for my data.
Also if I retroactively try and remove tags from a clip that fails. I can only add tags (seemingly).
Finally feature request... I would love to be able to have subtags #books #fiction. Maybe #books > fiction > fantasy or something. But only have one top level tag "books" and then have a subcategory organized under the #books tag. Collapse all the entries for a subtag or something.
You can add/update and remove tags from clips. What's the error you are seeing (or does it not show an error and just doesn't remove the tag when you refresh the page?) Can you send me info to mark@clipboard.com
Tag categories is something we have discussed and would definitely be a useful feature in the future.
Thanks Mark.
1. I am a self-proclaimed geek & although i love the nifty way to clip only parts of a page is awesome, its confusing, even to me.
2. About being able to share whole page easily & quickly Amdahl's law ( focus on the common case, 80% of use) would say there should be a fast, frictionless way to accomplish clipping of the entire webpage(which i believe is clipboard's common case)
Now a -ve of doing this would be to increase complexity - 2 options - either clip entire page or parts of a page.
But, you can do this with a well designed ui element.
3. i made this point on the beta launch hn thread, a lot of content consumption (article reading) happens on the ipad.
feature request : find neat content (from the clipboard corpus, twitter, fb, g+, prisimatic)
the clipboard ipad apps then, download a list of the top 'n'(configurable param) of articles on hn,twitter,fb, g+, to either a. locally on ipad, so can be viewed w/o a n/w connection (reading on train, public transit usecase) b. to my clipboard a/c on the cloud c. both a & b
My only question is.... how are you monetizing it? The browser extension can track my entire browser history. Are you uploading it to your servers?
Chrome instills fear into me when it announces that a plugin can gain access to my data (that's an instant put off for me.) I still don't actually get just what data a Chrome plugin has access to.
When that warning says "all your data on all of your websites" it f'ing means it.
Imagine the extension as a person on a computer in a remote location who is looking through every web page that you visit and taking actions on your behalf.
Different extensions might:
- Look through the content of a page and find things that are likely phone numbers and make them Skype links
- Select sections of a page and push their content to a server (ala Clipboard)
- Check if you're on a banking site, append an iframe of the site to itself and transfer funds out of your account.
It's the web browser equivalent of downloading a program onto your desktop, once it is installed (sandboxing aside) it can do quite a bit.
So I don't see why the Clipboard isn't going the same route.
As a former Clipmarks.com user, I have no intention to rely on any such clipping services for the daily curation I do (lately only for myself).
Curation based service sites have a front face which makes or breaks the adoption by those who pass by.
If you let your front face show whatever the heck people are clipping (for the sake of democracy and due to popular vote counts, a la Digg), you are letting the perception of your site go to garbage.
The perception Pinterest generated proves my point.
A visitor should be able to tell what kind of audience hangs out at such curation sites. Pinterest generated a perception of design, aesthetic, shopping etc. Its front page is well curated with a goal. Clipboard doesn't give that impression, and nor does any such clones of Pinterest.
I am not defending Pinterest over others (I don't use Pinterest), but people need to realize what they're missing when they run en mass after a successful formula.
There are so many such Pinterest-look alike sites showing up lately and besides copying the front page design, none seems to be offering anything of substance, or a reason for anyone to anchor their curations.
With an installed extension it would be much, much easier to just inject any ads they want onto any page you visit, or get a sponsor to skin their UI (think Pandora), or put ads in your pin board, or....
If turning amorphous data like browser history into cash was easy, Facebook would be making a lot lot lot more money.
I can't wait to watch their meteoric ascent.
Best of luck to the Clipboard team!
You can also have things private and/or shared with a select group of people, which is what I usually do.
For example, a common use case I've found is that I'll clip something from Gilt/other signup required sites, to show someone a deal they might be interested in, but they don't want to sign up just to look at it. If they like it, they end up signing up.
So the clips aren't totally live - if you are sharing content that is somehow walled off.
You make it sound like the snippets are static caches of content.
Sometimes those snapshots are not valuable after a while, so I delete them :)
For whatever reason, I just wrote another post about features and ways to distinguish this product from the competition in their other thread (http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4049752).
So the irony is that we make our API calls digitally signed (more secure) but to do so from the context of a bookmarklet you have to enable 3rd party cookies because browsers bundle that switch to the capability that we really need (i.e., there is no "enable loading of cross domain iframes that can read client local storage securely" option because its unfortunately pairs with 3rd party cookies).
Although you were impressed, clearly you don't actually value the service highly (as I don't think there is a similar service that performs better) so I don't think they lost much.
Will try the extension for now.