There should be a limit on the loan size you can take out.
It's wild that you can take out 200k with no collateral
It's wild that you can take out 200k with no collateral
Borrowing $200K for medical school has a completely different cost/benefit calculus than borrowing $200K to get a BA in English or History.
So, more of that, except linked to objective workforce measurements instead of cherry picking professions.
see also: Biden’s suggested plan to give thousands to every new home buyer to help address affordability
> see also: *the* suggested plan to give thousands to every new home buyer to help address affordability
Would still get the idea and issue across without the need to mention the 'who'. It does not change the meaning or the concern by adding in the 'who'. If that part was changed to any other name, would it still be a problem?
> If that part was changed to any other name, would it still be a problem?
I would ask the same of you. Frankly, I don't think I would have gotten a reply like this and downvoted if it hadn't been mentioning the president on an election year.
But for everyone bathed in the constant nuclear radiation of "{name}'s policy!!", it's going to remind people of the last time they saw a partisan clickbait mass media headline.
If you want to engage people's curiosity, probably better to reference nameless policies around elections.
Tldr - political news sucks, avoid anything that resembles it
I pretty much exclusively use HN as a refuge from that style of conversation.
I'm sorry that so many people's brains are poisoned by political news or whatever, but I'm not really going to change what I find is a useful way of referring to things just to accommodate them.
FWIW I am certainly going to vote for Biden, for all the good that it will do in California.
So either optimize for reality or stick to your principles.
It is injecting partisan into the discussion but in the end, we need to discuss partisan politics well rather than avoid it. I mean, I'd broadly say we're stuck currently with Democrats promoting bad policies of laying band-aids across the disastrous marketization policies of the past while the Republicans mindless "cut things", killing what good about the state and maintaining the worst policies (see the "national monument effect" etc).
Whether disparaging or promoting, naming the plan can be beneficial. It's pretty common to have multiple plans for the same topic/issue and calling out which one by the sponsor can differentiate it.