I am a China hawk. But nothing here implicates the CCP.
> It is one chinese guy stealing from another chinese guy
One, their ethnicity and even nationality are irrelevant.
Two, that was already adjudicated. This action is about one person--with adverse court records in two countries--stealing defence technology and "selling" it to a company he controls in China. The stealing was a civil matter. The exfiltration is a national-security one.
You are also 'american' too right?
> But nothing here implicates the CCP.
Yet you wrote: "He stole anti-drone technology from a Canadian company and gave it to China."
> One, their ethnicity and even nationality are irrelevant.
Sure it does. Why else would you have written : "... and gave it to China."
It's amazing how certain kinds of 'hellish flamebait' are allowed by dang.
This happens in Canada.
> Why else would you have written : "... and gave it to China."
Because he gave it to China! If I transfer military technology from idk Russia to my American company, I gave that kit to America. Whether I’m American is irrelevant. (And that action per se doesn’t mean I coördinated with the CIA.)
Countries can use agents of backgrounds other than their dominant one. Not every Russian spy is of a Russian ethnicity.