This has been the opposite of my experience.
I tend to interview very well... at least in the past. My confidence is shit now. I had mediocre skills then (deteriorated now). But I had a wealth of situations to pull from when they wanted me to tell them about certain times in my career. The code screens always killed me because I bounced between tech and teams too much to become a true expert. Now, this was at midlevel positions, not the higher level stuff the OP is looking at. I would hope the code screens are less of an issue for them. I'm fucked though.
Not saying it’s a bad idea but it does seem a little bad faith.
With that said, ethics aside, it does seem like a solid way to get practice.
The same principle applies here. The more interviews you do, the more comfortable you'll get, the better it'll go. And who knows, it might work out with one of the first companies you interview at!
Thanks for the advice, though!
They've always been a thing; at least in SV.
People who need to practice tech interviews, while probably optimizing for the wrong thing, have plenty of resources available to do that.
yeah, it sucks OP couldn't make his startups work. but if there's anything with a negative ROI in terms of learning it's interviews. you can do leetcode / behavioural etc, after 2/3 years it doesn't mean you're now a pro - if you stopped doing it
find places that appreciate builders OP. and that have less than 3 interview rounds.