Do Not Mess with Scarlett Johansson
thezvi.substack.com
thezvi.substack.com
> I repeat. Do not mess with Scarlett Johansson.
> You would think her movies, and her suit against Disney, would make this obvious.
What are the movies supposed to show? Is it a joke, or does the author not understand the difference between the actor and the role? Johansson is not actually Black Widow. Or what am I not understanding?
Of course the other points stand on their own, like successfully suing Disney. Just nitpicking.
Similar things could be said about Taylor Swift.
OTOH, Sky sounded more like Rashida Jones.
My experience, with one personal exception, is that deception and lies are the the hallmarks of a good CEO - good in the business sense. There is something about the kind of person that wants to be a CEO that attracts sociopaths. But I would argue for most businesses a sociopath is what you need to operate in a market environment predicated on preying on the pocketbooks of the populace.
Allowing such a market to arise is a societal problem. Thankfully the future can still be changed, if we want to badly enough
Let's imagine a society where power grabs are checked. Then we have an unstable equilibrium. Lucky and shrewd persons can become able to evade the checks. It's a bit like immunity of bugs to poisons. Bugs that die off don't reproduce so the system is self-selecting to immune bugs.
It's a pity.