Almost 30% of Americans Say College Not Worth It in Pew Poll
bloomberg.com
bloomberg.com
A lot of courses that looked like they were just there to fill time. Obviously everyone knows MIT and other top university lectures on youtube and those are great, but I was surprised to see people paying outrageous amounts for what looked like a genuine waste of time. Any more informed thoughts about the differences between top / bottom universities in the US?
During the time I was at RIT, I tutored in maths two students at the nearby community college (it was just down the road from where I lived), the level was abysmal and yes pretty close to learning html.
I’ve also hired and worked with people from top universities in my career, MIT’s reputation is deserving, people I’ve worked from there have been very good. Harvard not so much (but the sample is only 2 people and, well CS is not Harvard’s forte)
Note, this is most likely biased based on my experience but as someone educated in Europe that has spent most of my career working for US companies.
EDIT: oh one major difference between my mostly free(540 euros a year back then) French engineering school and the much more expensive (25000 usd per year at the time) RIT, the non-educational (sports etc) facilities were much nicer.
I actually have an amusing anecdote there. In one lower level class the professor ended up asking about how to convert a lower case string to an upper case one, or vice versa. I immediately chimed in with the right answer - you flip the 5th bit. This is literally how ASCII was intentionally designed. Capital and lower start at 65, and are separated by 32, so changing the case is a single bitflip. The same even works in unicode english characters where they're still separated by 32, though in this case it was not a unicode input string anyhow.
He just about lost his shit trying to mock me and my 'inelegant hacky solutions' in front of everybody. It didn't bother me in the least because I knew I was right, but later (perhaps after he looked it up?) he actually went out of his way to find me outside of class and sincerely apologize. I just found it all pretty amusing. But if anything it really emphasizes the overly embraced gulf between theory and practice at higher tier institutions, or at least mine. And FWIW this was an algorithms class which should ostensibly be 100% about practical application.
If you go to a lower-ranked school, it is full of working-class students who need to hit the ground running. So there is less abstract stuff and more practical stuff IMO. I've never been to a top school but I can tell you my program at a bargain state school was excellent and practical. It had theory as well but the university consulted industry people often to get feedback on the program.
{'h,', 'e,', 'l,', 'l,', 'o'};
He also gave them sample code where the assignment was to fill in the body of one of the functions, but in an unrelated part of the code he had a typo that resulted in infinite recursion in an object constructor.I once presented the most optimal solution, so I was tasked with presenting it to the class, but I wasn’t put down for it.
I wasn't challenged at all throughout my time, was extremely disappointed at the piss poor quality of eduction, and basically skipped class 2.5 years of a 3 year degree (still got the highest GPA somehow). (Btw, it sounds like I'm bragging about how smart I am but I was always always a middle/bottom of the road student, never the top but at least I never failed out and I enjoyed learning)
Maybe it was the "school" (not university it doesn't deserve that title) I went to that was weak, but I really expected more, at the very least to be challenged. Looking at my friend's course work from other universities it didn't seem much different except for the person doing nanobiology lol.
I think another factor it could be is the country I'm in (Denmark) has piss poor education throughout schooling (by the time they leave high school they can barely and I mean barely solve right angle triangle problems). I went through IB which is held to some modicum of a standard so that could also be what influenced this experience. Denmark for years has been reducing the challenge of its university level courses because students coming out of public education cannot keep up - nearly every year several professors from "the best" institutions complain about these students and have now started setting up extra courses to teach them the basics before they can actually go into the degree.
From about age 11 they are introduced to GeoGebra, Maple, etc. and the remainder of their education focusses on translating problems from paper into the computer and hitting solve - the result is unsurprisingly a bunch of students who "are great at mathematics" but don't even understand what a %age is (I took to helping my uni classmates who were struggling and I blew a guys mind when I explained %ages are just fractions, take the number and divide it by 100).
Actually had to skip some Comp Sci (my major) and math electives because some required liberal arts thing was in the same time slot. I could have used more training on both of those, as I've dealt with a lot of unemployment because I'm naturally fairly weak in both. Did not need liberal arts, had plenty of that in high school.
But compared to today, I didn't pay a lot nor did my parents, it just wasn't that expensive back then. College today seems to be a much worse deal, more filler content and way more expensive, as well as worse employment prospects overall when you do graduate, especially now that AI may be poised to smash a good fraction of those jobs.
But it sounds more like a US community college is more like what's usually branded and adult education centre here if "learn HTML" is the kind of agenda.
I think my education was pretty good. Was about 8k a year about 10 years ago. Worth every penny.
I went to a supposedly good university in the UK (Durham), to do a computer science degree. The university is in the so-called "Russell Group" of leading research universities and comes a little below Oxbridge in the rankings. That turned out to mean nothing: the course itself was garbage, with the department and its course being almost entirely fake. Cheating by the professors was rampant because they really didn't want to do teaching (teaching programming is notoriously hard), and universities mark their own homework, so if they don't want to do it properly there's nothing forcing them to do so as long as they team up and cover for each other. The students also didn't care because they were all struggling and happy to conspire a little with their teachers in order to get the bit of paper they were all there for. I was gutted, I'd been looking forward to doing CS at university literally since being a little kid. My parents had been singing its praises for years, but looking back I wonder to what extent they were just flattered to be allowed to go at all. My mother was the first of her family to go to university and they were all super proud of her, a common story in that era.
After graduation relatively few of the students took jobs related to doing computing, let alone to do computer science. A lot went off to do things like accounting, subject switches, banking, one even became a VC. After graduating I went to work for Google and was assigned to interviewing rotation. On that road you learn pretty quickly that degrees mean nothing. The best candidates have random degrees in unrelated subjects. Back then people with CS degrees from supposedly top universities regularly couldn't start new projects in the editor/IDE of their choice, couldn't write programs that load text files from disk and struggled to manipulate arrays. Sometimes people with no degree at all managed to get past the recruiter firewall and breezed their way through it. Even job history was of little use back then, though I imagine it's got more signal now.
Asking people if college is worth it is a tricky thing, because it conflates two very different things. Is it worth it for the educational value? I suspect many realize the answer is no. Is it worth it to get past the ever escalating auto-filters HR departments like to mount? Maybe still, but that's not a sustainable perspective. Soon people will master the art of using LLMs to review CVs properly and cut HR out of the loop. The prompts probably won't be dwelling on elite universities outside of the few firms that have incorporated that demand into their cultural DNA.
I think one can do an engineering job as easily with or without a degree.
I think attending college may have value in terms of social life.
I think degrees are used today as a mean to filter job candidates in the absence of better ways to assess candidates. So degrees are inflationary in the sense that if everyone had X degrees, jobs would require X+1 degrees as they have to filter out candidates if they are saturated with applications.
Having said that, education in the US is too expensive. It is captured by an olygopoly and it needs competition.
College has a monopoly on social life if you're in the late teens/early 20s. I believe this is part of the reason it is still such a popular option, to the point that people will pay extortionate amounts to do useless degrees.
If you're thrust straight into work that isn't stocking shelves or being a fry cook you won't be around people your own age and it's very alienating. I'm in my early 20s and have considered changing course despite having a successful SWE career to go back to university just so I can have a social life.
Most the social aspect for me though came from living near the college and not the actual classes.
If I was in this situation, I would just move as physically close to a major university as I could. Most of my social interaction at college came from eating lunch and all the people I met during lunch.
Actually paying tuition though for this reason is as bad an investment as I can think of.
Actually not a bad idea, thanks.
>paying tuition though for this reason is as bad an investment as I can think of
True, but my 'smart' financial decisions have led to a life I'm pretty unhappy with.
Who is going to sit down for 2-3 years (assuming you're faster by yourself to help your argument) and self learn with the same intensity, giving themselves the same amount of homework and projects?
That stuff is actually pretty cheap when compared to tuition, no?
What I agree, however, would be to break down the learning into smaller steps and going back to the apprentice where one learn and earn at the same time.
In theory. In practice, few people have the intelligence and discipline to self-study engineering subjects for a couple of years - that's what higher ed schools are for. I sure as shit wouldn't end up in software engineering (by far the easiest branch of engineering to self-study and get a job in) without doing my CS degree - my motivation and tenacity when I was 20 years old weren't nearly on the level required.
Maybe 10 years ago.
I'd argue the opposite, college/uni has negative impact in your life.
What is missing from that thought is: can everyone learn online what's required to do an engineering job? No.
There is something fundamentally wrong with the education system, but I don't think that promoting it as a scam is a good thing. Nor do I think that saying "anyone with internet can learn X to do Y" is fair - because while it's true anyone can, but the missing detail is that not everyone can.
My anecdote is that I enjoyed both systems - college and learning on my own, and I think they complement each other.
But public high schools are a joke.
We have failed the poor and working class especially young men of all backgrounds.
At one point, you could graduate high school OR even not graduate and get a good job that let you buy a car and move out of your parents house.
Within a few years you could save up and buy a starter home for a family.
Until there’s meaningful reinvestment into public school education that helps young men obtain the skills to become gainfully employed at 18 years of age as an apprentice or junior anything in a meaningful career then we’ll continue to have problems with wealth inequality, crime, drug use and apathy.
Basically everything that gets you a decent paying and stable job if that's what you're after: STEM, law, medicine, management consulting, banking, finance. Did I miss any?
ProTip: catalogues are for people unwilling to do social engineering; if you can get the relevant people to sign off on it, you can turn just about any cursus into a degree programme.
EDIT: CMU produced both Olin "Jack 'n Zac helps me get through the meetings without one of my students winding up with his severed head in a bowling-ball bag" Shivers and Tom "imagine that instead of chainsaws, we are juggling something more dangerous" [Murphy] 7, so I assume that despite my current lack of ghits, "useless CS degree" is a term of art there?
[Not to mention Perlis, Newell, Floyd, Feigenbaum & Reddy, Clarke, etc., but all of these, while duly recognised by more august bodies, are far less likely to have ever been Gonzo Informaticians, finding themselves somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when attacked by "huge bytes, all swooping and screeching and diving". In https://fictionadvocate.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/gonzo... I guess that'd be Tom7 driving with Dr. Shivers riding shotgun?]
For medicine, to become a doctor, you literally HAVE to go to college/university and becoming a doctor is the best guarantee that exists to live a life in wealth. Pretty much the same requirements, with more wiggle room, for most engineers, with less of the guarantee. Some business degrees set you up for a lucrative career as big4 consultant. And many liberal arts degrees set you up for a future as Starbucks barista and life long student debt.
college != college
Because my generation grew up having all of those thrown into the same pot. Kindergarten to high school the constant mantra from parents, teachers, to counsellors was to, "Get a degree! It doesn't matter what the degree is, just get one and you will have a good job! If you don't you will be a garbage man for the rest of your life!"
And the adults all genuinely believed it. Because it was true in their generation. An fine arts degree was basically a ticket to a decent paying office job as some manager's administrative assistant typing out letters, taking phone calls and scheduling meetings.
It's not that true anymore, even when I entered into the work force. And that was a long time ago.
I know two history majors well, both found it very hard to use it for anything. One started over on a math major as math teachers are in high demand. Other had taken a single psychology course as one of their self-selected courses during their degree, and ended up teaching psychology in high-school, as the school had plenty of history majors to pick from but hardly any with psychology.
If they could be defaulted on, the loans companies would have to figure out which degrees they should loan to, and not everyone would go to college and get a degree that will never pay back.
The problem with it is that they provide an endless firehose of money, that drives tuition costs up.
The administrative bloat that has driven up costs will eat every single penny that will still be available.
It wouldn't be as many pennies as it does today, but it would still capture every bit of that free money that it can.
Original Pew Research report PDF: https://www.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/20/2024...
In my experience if you want to work in the kind of software fields and companies that enable you to retire then you should go to school. These places often gate your acceptance behind algorithm problems. Those problems you will only know the tricks to solving if you have a decent background in math, unless you want to spend a lot of time memorizing answers. A lot of SWEs have a pretty intuitive understanding of math that they don't even realize when compared to average people. This was something I noticed immediately about myself when working with degreed peers. That's to say, I spent a lot of time early in my career reading books on math primers and algorithms. I understand people who have degrees do this at times as well, but believe me when I say my primer and your primer were different in their thickness.
What I wish is that software application (as opposed to theory) were taught in more in the way that we teach and level up trades. You could even split this out among some high level fields. On top of that, I'd really enjoy watching us ditch LeetCode interviews and base them on this certification and work history. I think we'd retain people in software longer, it'd counter ageism, and it'd attract a lot more diverse talent.
Tertiary to that, college is an experience. It's where a lot of people grow up, make mistakes, learn to grow quite a bit, etc... not that it's entirely worth the price of admission, but it is an important place for young people imo.
I always find myself reading some random courses that I find around on Internet; so many times I wished to have followed a well organised, coherent theoretical learning track, for ex, in compilers
Is my business degree worth it? I paid it dearly, around 12000/y for 3 years, it adds absolutely nothing to the ability to perform my job.
It does however, act like a signal for recruiters, signalling that I am "smart enough", and multiple times I found that it did play a non-negligible role
It's relatively easy for most people to get into college but not always to completion. That is the only benefit that college bestows - recognition that you are capable of committing to a program, and meeting deadlines in a formal, adult-oriented environment.
I feel like if you think of extended study purely for financial gain you might be doing education wrong.
Thing is, employers don't leave another choice. It's either jobs on the level of flipping burgers, the trades, or it's going to college because even mediocre paper-pusher jobs require a college degree these days.
The reasons for that are pretty simple:
- college degrees save employers money on training cost, as the students have to shoulder it (you know, it used to be a red flag for scam jobs if you were required to pay for the privilege of getting the job - but with college, it's accepted that we saddle 18 year olds with five figures of debt)
- they are a versatile proxy... they weed out people from entire classes of society (the poor, the disabled, people of color, people with mental or physical health issues - all of that has close correlations with lower chances of academic degrees) completely legally
- they reduce risk of hiring a "dud" - if you can't get out of bed reliably in the morning and stick to deadlines you won't get an academic degree, so requiring degrees weeds out this as well with no financial risk to the employers.
There is only one way out: legally mandating that requiring a college degree for a job is only allowed if there is a material need for the knowledge acquired during a matching academic degree.
Also the result you get out of college very often mirrors that mindset: if you are there to primarily learn and expand your skillset, I'd say college is virtually always worth it.
I studied at 6 different universities (with varying teaching quality and approaches) and always learnt tons.
In reality the benefits are far closer to purely financial gain than purely learning, and personally I found that the structure of university severely limited the amount I could learn.
If the time doesn't allow that, make friends with people in those courses/classes and ask them to forward to you the slides/presentations of their classes (or trade yours for their if they want to).
Contact professors working on projects you are interested in, regardless of whether they are your professors and/or if it is your major. Since you'd be generally unpaid, you might have lots of freedom to modify the project as you need/please, or join what they are already doing.
Check out facilities/available materials and other tools that the university provides.
If you do that, you'll learn several orders of magnitude more than most students there.
I did that pretty much at every uni I went to, and still managed to do some good amount of partying and part-time job.
If I'm going to audit whatever classes I want, why would I even enroll in the university? Chances are if I asked nicely I could sit in, talk to the professors and even use some facilities.
Part of the package with university is the structure. If you're saying people should throw that away, why are they even going to university?
University is almost always "worth it" in terms of absolute gain, but I think its alpha over other approaches is very dubious when it comes to how much you will learn and improve your skillset. Depending on your goals, it can be a very poor learning environment.
And then made it look like 30% of Americans have this view so that your brain takes the view seriously.
Investigating why they lie to themselves and others to spread this idea is the actual truth here.
I recommend studying a little of basic statistics.
Also why not say we surveyed 6000 people in our list instead and 30% of them have this view? That is more true than saying 30% of Americans have this view which is quite a big jump. There is ofcourse some lying going on here. What are they trying to achieve by lying here is my question.
https://www.pewresearch.org/our-methods/
https://www.pewresearch.org/topic/methodological-research/su...
https://www.pewresearch.org/topic/methodological-research/
There are literal books devoted to survey methodology.
survey statistics work by computing the margin of error for a specific sample size.
for example, if you toss a coin, say 10times and it shows heads 9 out of ten times, would you say "oh this was completely coincidental, you have to throew it more times before you can know!" or would you already say the coin is biased after ten tosses?
And the key thing is: there is math for that. "How probable is it that this result that I see is representative for all the possible coin tosses that I could ever make with this coin?" or, in our case here "How probable is it that the result of _these_ 6000 people here is close enough to what I'd get if I ask all Americans with a College degree?"
and let me assure you, a sample size of 6000, properly controlled for biases, gives a very representative result.
If you'd cry foul for 30 respondents, I'm with you.
but for 6000? and a professional research institute which klnows how to do their homework? nah.
If you doubt what I say here, feel free to brush up your statistics (udemy, udacity, ...) and then review the Pew methodology. I'll be curious about your findings.
Because their methodology is designed to work through sampling, and sampling can determine results with very high confidence (95-99%) from a quite small sample size of the overall population, they don't need to qualify further given Pew has a trustworthy methodology for sampling.
It's not a big jump, it's how sampling works. I really recommend you read about it, it might be very helpful to understand and stop thinking "they're lying!", they are not.
It's basic statistics, you are trying to argue against very established mathematics.
You can learn more about surveys and statistics through the following links:
Understanding and Evaluating Survey Research:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4601897/
Fundamentals of Survey Research Methodology:
https://www.mitre.org/sites/default/files/pdf/05_0638.pdf
What is survey sampling: Understanding methodology and sampling techniques:
https://blog.surveyplanet.com/what-is-survey-sampling-unders...
OXFAM: Understanding survey sampling:
https://oxfamilibrary.openrepository.com/bitstream/handle/10...
Some general knowledge on surveys:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survey_methodology
Statistics learning course on Kahn Academy:
https://www.khanacademy.org/math/statistics-probability
These links will hopefully help you understand surveys and statistics more. If you need more links, let me know. I can find a lot more courses on these topics if you need.
I couldn't find any polls that showed the opposite.
[1] https://www.wsj.com/articles/americans-are-losing-faith-in-c... https://archive.md/1SrWr
[2] https://news.gallup.com/poll/508352/americans-confidence-hig...