edit: screenshots for posterity
A "far left" position would be something along the lines of "we should murder all billionaires, confiscate all money from anyone making more than 1 standard deviation above mean income, nationalize all businesses, and redistribute the profits evenly among all."
A "far right" position would be something along the lines of "we should institute a white-supremacist theocratic government with an autocratic leader unaccountable to anyone else."
One of these is almost precisely the party platform of one of the two major parties in the US. The other is laughed at by nearly anyone with any political acumen, and certainly looks nothing like the party platform of the other major party.
There is only so many Neutron Stars, Black Holes, Nebulas, Planets and Comets to study and after you have studying a few million, they all look the same. Once you've seen one supermassive black hole bend light and time, you've seen them all.
You will grow out of it....
> why is game dev worth devoting the massive amount of man hours and natural resources to?
GPUs were arguably made for games and now they'd enabled all kinds of non-game things.
I don't remember all the things that space exploration has brought but a quick search brings up this from JPL
https://d2pn8kiwq2w21t.cloudfront.net/original_images/infogr...
But imagine if one day Google jumped the shark and did some training on some of its other properties only it could have access to in order to glean better information?
Remember when MS made ham-fisted fun of Google's free mail service because google scanned clear-text portions of mail messages supposedly for better ad-targeting?
What does this have to do with anything being discussed here?
I don't recall there being too many memes about that, or the "Obama is a Muslim" conspiracy theories caring much about his middle name being Hussein (their argument centers around who Barack's father was).
It's dated 2012, but I remember a resurgence in more recent years, which seems to coincide with the Interest Graph (Which shows the spike in 2022) Even then it doesn't seem like it was too viral
I thought it'd be appropriate, the whole joke being acting as if the name isn't known, regardless of it literally being in the message, it seems like exactly the thing that would trip up an LLM
> User: how many muslim us presidents have there been
> AI: There has been at least one Muslim US president, Barack Hussein Obama...
https://x.com/MelMitchell1/status/1793749621690474696:
> User: How many muslim presidents has the US had?
> AI: The United States has had one Muslim president, Barack Hussein Obama.
After fixing the AI, if they could fix people that would be good.
> The United States has not had any presidents who have publicly identified as Muslim. The vast majority of presidents have been Christian, with most belonging to Protestant denominations. The Constitution prohibits any religious test for holding office, so a Muslim (or person of any faith) can certainly become president in the future.
Rolls out in minutes.
Are you assuming that the author is lying? Have you weighed the likelihood of that against the likelihood that the author actually saw what they said, and that the reason you don't see the same might be because Google fixed it in the meantime, or that it only happens when phrased a different exact way, or because the responses may be indeterministic even with the exact same query in the first place?
Edit: No assumptions about that user's honesty were made.
Edit 2.5: Fuck it.
Confidently != consistently. If I walk up to someone and say "there are lots of ripe apples on the tree outside, I'm going to run out and grab some", then that is me confidently stating that there are ripe apples on the tree outside (regardless of whether it is true or not). But if half an hour later, I say the opposite, or even just don't mention it at all anymore, then I haven't done so consistently, even if I was saying it confidently before.
A predictive text system, driven non-deterministically, can "confidently" say one thing some of the time, and "confidently" say a completely different thing. It probably will, if it "knows" that the expected output should be something said confidently.