There is nothing new about people forming their own opinions without following the rules of courts of law. Indeed, it wouldn't have been so important to enshrine the "innocent until proven guilty" principle into legal systems, if it were already the normal way for people to react to things.

It's ok for people to just be people. Courts should be held to a higher standard, but that doesn't mean regular people should be expected to act like courts.

In today's climate I can I can infer through OpenAI's past and present actions what their intent was.

Today's climate, where Silicon Valley billionaires occasionally have to endure some mild pushback.