Written by a woman, by the way.

I mention this because I was surprised to realize that upon reaching the end of the article, and then of course I had to interrogate why I was surprised. I’m sure this will get some (justifiable) hate, but: I was more sympathetic to the arguments after realizing the author didn’t conform to my stereotype of a mathematically-focused man who undervalued other disciplines.

(I clearly have a blind spot around women who undervalue other disciplines.)