Those old wives tales have some truth to them. (or having grown up in the deep south, we just blindly believed them)
Back when the duct tape study came out, one theory was that anything irritating the area enough to get the immune system to kick in would work.
For people who haven't ready the article, duct tape worked twice as well as cryothérapie.
We were told to cut the potato in half, rub it on the wart, put the potato back together and bury it.
Not a lot of references that I have found.
https://www.peoplespharmacy.com/articles/eggplant-banished-w...
There’s another cure that involves tracing it on paper and burning the paper every day until the wart is gone.
The last time I had a wart, I decided to cut it out because I was so sick of having it on a tender part of my finger. I know for sure I didn’t get the base of the wart, but within a week both that wart and my other tiny wart were gone. I just finally had enough of the freeloader and my body got the message.
I don't know.
I know biofeedback is a real and useful thing and may account for at least some of what people dismiss as placebo effect.
But I'm not personally a big believer in that stuff being particularly significant medically. I think it's more likely that a ritual helps keep the mind focused on "I want this gone!" And that may subtly alter behavior in ways that support the desired outcome without the individual knowing exactly what they did differently.
Historically, some doctor had a track record of referring patients for an STD test (syphilis iirc) much earlier than usual and consistently being right. Rather than pretending he must be psychic or a magic voodoo witch doctor or some bullshit, they put two other doctors in the room with him to see if they could spot what he was seeing well enough to refer patients for testing without being able to tell you why.
This is how an earlier, subtler symptom was identified -- an eye flutter -- and that empowered other doctors to look for it too so they could refer patients for testing earlier as well instead of acting like he was all special and no one else could possibly do what he did. (Of course, earlier identification generally translates to better medical outcomes.)
If potassium is a means to treat it, you can increase your potassium intake by eating differently without consciously realizing:
A. I increased my potassium intake.
B. My increased potassium levels are the real reason my warts went away -- or at least one of the pertinent factors.
Most dietary studies are "observational" and also self reported. These are both weak means to make any kind of cause-and-effect connection and there's no obvious way to improve on it because it's generally considered unethical to experiment medically on humans by doing extreme things to them and also if you don't lock them down and have absolute control over them, you will not know for certain that they weren't sneaking food not listed or making themselves throw up on purpose or something.
People have all kinds of bizarre behaviors around diet and routinely actively hide it from other people or outright lie. People with eating disorders usually don't tell their social circle they are anorexic or bulimic. They hide that fact.
How do you get people to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth about their diet? How do you make sure they report every single candy bar grabbed from a vending machine during a busy workday? How do you ensure they don't fib about something because they feel X is socially unacceptable?
Presumably, if you tried, you would get self-selected volunteers who saw themselves as "eating right" and generally fitting a particular pattern of consumption. You probably wouldn't get a lot of volunteers on "weirdo" diets and if you did, how do you meaningfully compare data for your vegan participant and your carnivore diet participant?
And that's just diet. There are other things in life beyond diet that impact health.
And also explains the diverse array of purportedly efficacious substances.
The purported mechanism of action was not to destroy the verucca, although that was the immediate effect; they didn't try to hit all of them. The purported mechanism was to cause damage that would provoke the immune system; it would learn the properties of the virus, and then attack it wherever it found it.
It worked; all my veruccas disappeared, including ones that hadn't been zapped.
I have to say that this was easily the most-painful medical treatment I have ever undergone. Each targeted verucca got a 5s blast, twice per treatment, over a programme of three treatments. Each blast caused me to scream out loud and swear. I apologised to the podiatrist, saying I hoped I hadn't annoyed her neighbours. She said not to worry, everyone screams and swears. It was like having a sharpened red-hot screwdriver pushed into the sole of my foot.
The pain was only during the jolts; when the treatment was over, I put back on my shoes and socks, and walked home (under a mile).
I can take pain; but I'll fkin scream and swear if I need to scream and swear. Basically, if I can stand the pain and not pass out, then I'd rather not be numb while some sawbones is hacking away at me.
when the mice died, the simple environment mice had lots less interconnected neurons in their brain than the complex environment mice.
turns out it wasn't the complex environment that caused the brain development, it was the exercise wheel.
Surely paper touching a wart doesn’t do anything substantial other than trigger the placebo effect.