Operation CHARM: Car repair manuals for everyone
charm.li
charm.li
I have some CD filled with I guess downloads from a factory online manual. It’s not the best experience to be sure.
VW: https://erwin.vw.com/ Toyota: https://techinfo.toyota.com
(Realoem is pretty comprehensive for BMW parts numbers, if you need them)
That said, a lot of newer official service manuals don't really go into detail and just give instructions on how to disassemble and swap parts; better than no manual, but a huge contrast from older ones that would also include detailed theory of operation and troubleshooting information.
which sadly means that no current car models are included.
Everything else, like oil, brakes or fluid changes are basically the same as any other car. I understand that this kind of runs afoul of the spirit of this post, but there’s a reason many engines are simply replaced when they encounter some kind of major malfunction.
Ironically my old Toyota is one of the hardest to really get at sensor and dealer-software changes.
In personal experience, VW manuals are atrocious to figure out while Toyota, at least around 2000 put out wonderful service manuals even if the ECU's are locked down.
In personal experience, VW manuals are atrocious to figure out while Toyota, at least around 2000 put out wonderful service manuals even if the ECU's are locked down.
It seems like one effect of this is that the temperature display can not be localized. Most everything else on a US market Toyota can be converted to metric but it looks like the AC and internal dash display for temperature can't be changed by the dealer, by knowledgeable users or by repair shops.
You are definitely correct about foreign (non-USA) makes. My wife had an Audi when we got married. I own a small toolbox of tools specific to her Audi S4 that I will never use again, but that was a 2006, so this issue predates 2013 for the makes that it is true about.
Admittedly, I try to avoid fuel injected vehicles. So I don't go out of my way to work on new things.
I do a lot of auto work, between restoring cars to repairing my own. But modern fuel injection systems run on a razor’s edge of tolerances and often getting to some part requires dismounting a turbo, which is all sorts of pain in the ass, and not something I’d recommend for an amateur.
The only cool thing is the wiring harnesses and everything are fully analog so like, you have fuel injection mechanically, i mean that in itself is cool. it's just a pain
My tractors are something I always marvel over, besides the starter you don't need any power. I have an old Cat diesel that doesn't even have an electric starter! Uses a small gas engine (called a pony engine) to start the large diesel engine, and the gas engine uses a pull start, very similar to a lawn mower engine.
They always have direct injection into the cylinder as far as I know. Maybe in the early 1900's they did manifold injection but I don't think so.
It's just a total different concept.
How the metering is done (IE How much fuel to meet load) though may have been similar, I am not sure. I 'asked a friend' on this one, since I am really unfamiliar with diesels in general.
And there are some engines that are indirect injection (called IDI). I've been on the hunt for a 90s 7.3l IDI. They're gutless without a turbo, but slap a pair of turbos on and it makes a heck of a towing machine. But I don't know as much about diesels, partly because they just never break the way a gas engine will. I've rebuilt a few gas engines, diesels just seem to be made of tougher stuff.
I have always stuck to American muscle and diesel tractors. The amazing simplicity of those machines has always attracted me. I love that I can hold a complete understand of the entire vehicle in my head. I'm sure you can even for modern vehicles, but they're not simple at all!
Newer cars have much better safety systems but have unfortunately gone all in for making things difficult.
Only a catastrophic failure[1] results in an engine replacement. For the p99 of car owners out there (especially in rust-prone areas), the engine will outlast the body by a large margin.
[1] And for some types of catastrophic failure, such as overheating damage, it's still cheaper to replace the head only.
Well, there's confounding factors: the type of bolt (such as stretch bolts), the material the bolt is going into (heads are aluminium, while some sleeves in aluminium parts are not), whether the bolt is lubricated before insertion (spark plugs really should be lubricated), etc.
Bolt size is just another variable.
I love old original FSMs (factory service manuals) and tend to buy them for a car I’m beginning to restore. I’ll reach out to these folks to see if they’d be interested in scans of them or whatever they use to build this site.
Even when I manage to find what I think is an FSM it seems a little hard to follow what’s really going on in a given section without reading the section for every other assembly involved.
For third parties, I find Bentley manuals to be extremely good and thorough.
Thanks for the tip on the Bentley manuals, too!
This is basically wholesale copyright infringement.
For another vehicle I know well, there's basically no actual repair information - just diagrams telling you where to find a particular component in the car. Nothing about how to actually do diagnostics or repairs.
(Aside, it’s interesting that car people seem to be one of the groups that still use old fashioned BBS-style web forums.)
I just checked and both Auto Repair Source and Chilton have manuals for that car in their database.
Im also chuffed to see the "pictures" in the service catalogue are just as pathetic as the ones some manufacturers include in the paid service portals. Freightliner and Mac manuals are all pristine...theres clearly an artist on salary who gets paid very very well for his craft. Companies that rhyme with Bilbo however include photos that look like they were taken with a gameboy color camera on a stormy night.
I’m coming up with nothing except Volvo, so I’m assuming that’s a typo.
Tesla is one of very, very few companies for which its parts aren't available via the OEMs; parts made for Teslas can only be had via Tesla. If some part in your VW goes bad or breaks or wears, you often have up to three options: from VW via dealers, via the OEM that made the part for VW, via parts distributors - or via non-OEMs that have made a compatible part. VW (and others) often source from multiple OEMs or switch OEMs, so you sometimes have multiple OEM supplier options.
With Tesla? Only via them. For every fucking part on the car save stuff like brake pads and rotors.
You have to give them a VIN number to buy a part, and if the VIN belongs to a car Tesla has decided isn't roadworthy anymore, they won't go any further.
Want to put a small block chevy V8 into your Yugo? The guy at the GM dealer part counter will happily sell you one as long as you've got the money. Discovered that a Ford temperature sensor is a more reliable replacement for the one in your Jeep? The parts counter staff won't even blink when they sell you one.
The only time you'll get asked for a VIN is if the part you're asking for has varied with production, and certain VIN ranges might require a specific part for compatibility.
Curious what legal mechanism they are trying to use here, and on how solid legal ground they are... somehow I imagine it could make interesting legal case if they sued someone making new parts.
and use rockauto.com for cheap parts (not affiliated)
Permanently free and available just means until the website fails to pay the hosting bills or gets taken down by lawyers. Akin to a lifetime warranty. The company will surely fail before you do.