Italy's $12.7B Bridge to Sicily [video]
youtube.com
youtube.com
Btw: taking the boat from Messina to Villa San Giovanni is quite a nice experience. There is a tradition to eat arancini while crossing. Most Sicilians are not actually hoping so much to see this bridge to be completed, especially since in Catania and Palermo there are very high traffic airports with plenty of cheap options to go to Rome or Milan (Catania airport is the 3rd by number of flights in Italy). If the fast trains available in the North would be available here, it would be different perhaps.
About the social factors, if the bridge would start from Catania, where I live, I could be a bit more positive about the ability to complete it. Catania has kinda of a different mentality compared to the rest of Sicily (I guess I can tell this without biases since I'm from the center of Sicily and lived in multiple places for years). For instance Catania is the only place under Naples to have a subway. Apple and Ikea are in Catania, and so forth, in general you can make things work here, and even if this is a national project, local factors may play a role. Messina is not similarly well positioned.
What you fail to mention is that very often such “cheap” flights and paid in part by the state with public money. If that bridge you’d have other options
It’s a bit like those insane parking costs - they are left for people who REALLY need it.
Government can’t print more tickets for nonexistent seats.
5th, not 3rd [0], after Rome, Milan, Bergamo, Naples, and before Venice - passengers, not number of flights.
[0]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_busiest_airports_i...
See page 83 of
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JHNwYFeNqfE2K6u08vk2-_ujhrY...
Would a rail connection help with shipping goods? Would a road connection help with transport trucks?
The biggest issue with Sicily infrastructure is that most of the rail lines are single tracks, plus southern of Salerno you don't have high speed trains. Therefore the bridge itself cannot make much of an impact without fixing the infrastructure at both sides of the (hypothetical) bridge.
But I’m curious (if you don’t mind) - as an accomplished programmer/entrepreneur, do you ever feel torn between wanting to live in your idyllic home of Sicily, vs. a hub like Silicon Valley? Do you feel limited in terms of what you can do, and does that matter to you?
I ask because Sicily seems close to your heart, while I think it’s also safe to assume that you would have lots of opportunity elsewhere. I imagine staying was a very conscious decision?
There are lots of wonderful but “small” corners of the world where people might face the same dilemma.
That's the real problem of Sicily; it's not about the bridge itself, but rather the whole ecomomic situation and living standard that lags behind the rest of Italy. I don't remember if the rest of Sicily is affected, but in Trapani we don't even get fresh water every day! Instead each house has canisters and pumps that fill every 3 days or so. Another example might be the almost complete lack of actual industries and a much more agricultural-based economy, to the point that almost all sicilians also own a farm or a piece of farmland (or at least I think so, again, I haven't visited much outside of Trapani). There are *lots* of things to improve, but I still think that Sicily has one of the highest economic potentials of the 20 regions, because it has lots of natural resources, people and space, and Catania is definitely an example of that potential turned into reality.
Also Palermo does have a subway, so Catania isn't the only city with such privilege.
Also, this is a great region, if you can ever get there in an RV - you are not going to regret it!
The video shows one politician a couple of times, but he's one of the most unreliable ones (and Italians one in general are not that reliable).
It's a political tool, many speculate it's just another big project that will never be completed, since it's a common historical pattern with heavy right-wing governments like the current one.
Even though a lot of money has already been spent, it remains especially difficult to detach this project from its political side so don't hold breath, or hope.
But who knows, MOSE seemed a pipe dream too.
Whatever their budget - there isn't enough unobtainium around to construct tunnel wall strong enough.
https://web.archive.org/web/20161018110338/http://jr.hakodat...
> Minimum overburden (under seabed): 100m
> Maximum sea depth: 140m
Excuse me for being daft, is the difference going to be a showstopper ? Construction and material engineering surely advanced since quite a bit.
At the Straits of Messina, the tunnel would be crossing an active rift zone ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siculo-Calabrian_rift ). That rift is the source of those big earthquakes - such as https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1908_Messina_earthquake - which was at the Straits, magnitude 7.1, and killed ~75k people. And for extra bonus fun - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_etna - is one of the world's most active volcanoes, part of that active rift zone, and less than 80km from the Straits.
(Vs. the geological maps I can find seem to show that the Seikan tunnel does not cross any sort of active fault.)
Stuttgart 21: from €3,5B to €11,5B and finish not in sight. So the bridge has potential to reach €50B.
That is the purpose of the EU institutions. It's the 2nd biggest scam, after the mandatory pension schemes. Note that the EU is currently jealous of the biggest ponzi of all time and hence wants its own: they want to remove veto-rights of member states on fiscal policies to be able to create an EU-wide, mandatory, pension fund (it's literally in talks right now).
The public sector knows how to do one thing: seize private property (through taxes) to fund projects whose sole goal is to steal taxpayers money. Going from $3.5bn to $11bn over budget is the goal. In that these projects are very successful.
That's why we don't have the equivalent of Tesla in Europe and that's why the European State Agency is nowhere compared to SpaceX.
There's not a dollar or a EUR that's less well used that a dollar or EUR that's been through public spendings.
Play stupid communist games (like having gigantic public spendings), end, all EU-wide, with a stupid failing economy.
The EU shall only keep falling into irrelevancy on the world scene.
so I guess Europeans didnt forget as your 2 projects interpolation didnt work out very well.